2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different nutrition labels on visual attention and accuracy of nutritional quality perception – Results of an experimental eye-tracking study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result indicates that consumers approve of having more information when consuming meals and snacks in food services. Studies have shown that the more information the consumer obtains when buying a product/food, the better it is for their health and, consequently, their quality of life [ 27 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result indicates that consumers approve of having more information when consuming meals and snacks in food services. Studies have shown that the more information the consumer obtains when buying a product/food, the better it is for their health and, consequently, their quality of life [ 27 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the products with packages containing only textual information were more likely to be purchased. Therefore, variations among the target population must be considered to adopt the best strategy [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of those, a total of 25 reports were excluded based on the final eligibility criteria, as 10 of the reports did not investigate FOP food labels as defined in this review, five of the reports did not investigate behaviors related to healthy foods, four of the reports did not investigate the dependent variable specified in this review, and one report did not use primary data collection. This resulted in a total of 30 articles included in this review [ 15 , 33 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hagmann & Siergrist [ 63 ] investigated the effects of the graded nutrient-specific and summary labels and found that graded nutrient-specific labels were most effective. Gabor et al [ 66 ] investigated the effects of graded nutrient-specific, graded summary labels, and percentage nutrient-specific labels and found that graded summary labels were the most effective. Deliza et al [ 55 ] investigated percentage nutrient-specific labels, graded nutrient-specific labels, and single nutrient-specific labels, and Lima et al [ 70 ] studied percentage nutrient-specific labels, graded nutrient-specific labels, and single nutrient-specific labels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%