2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of different shot peening parameters on residual stress, surface roughness and cell size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
31
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The mathematical description of this optimization problem is as follows: where x = ( σ surface , σ max , y max , y core ) is called an individual in GA. Each component of the individual is called a “gene”. The constraints in Equation (8b–g) are summarized from the existing experimental [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ] and theoretical [ 13 , 42 ] results for RS distribution profiles produced using the shot peening process.…”
Section: Optimization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical description of this optimization problem is as follows: where x = ( σ surface , σ max , y max , y core ) is called an individual in GA. Each component of the individual is called a “gene”. The constraints in Equation (8b–g) are summarized from the existing experimental [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ] and theoretical [ 13 , 42 ] results for RS distribution profiles produced using the shot peening process.…”
Section: Optimization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both procedures aim to prevent the formation and propagation of cracks during cyclic loading, the mode by which they tackle the problem is different: electropolishing eliminates surface irregularities and stress concentrators by polishing and wear 11 , 26 , while SP induces residual compressive stresses under a plastic deformation layer, which also aims to eliminate the existing cracks and their propagation (Fig. 2 b), as well as the surface defects that can act as stress concentrators under cyclic loads 16 , 51 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When T ! 100%, with a decrease of D c , R t simulation value decreases gradually, this is because the overlapping rate of dimples gradually increases, and equation (3) shows that R t is proportional to D c . Therefore, R t and R sm can be decreased by decreasing D c , to improve the surface topography of the target material.…”
Section: Influence Of Process Parameters On Surface Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can induce elasticplastic strain in metal material, and induce a compressive residual stress field (RSF) in the material surface. Compared with the classical shot peening, [1][2][3][4] the impact positions of the shots are disordered, random, and chaotic for the classical shot peening, while the impact positions of the shots are regular and controllable by adjusting peening parameters for abrasive water jet sequential peening (AWJSP). In AWJP process, shots pass through a nozzle with dense carrier water to reach a certain velocity, and then the shots impact on the target material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%