“…Empirically, it is reported that US firms are charged more for D&O insurance coverage if they have lower earnings quality or prior accounting restatements (Cao & Narayanamoorthy, 2014). In Taiwan, firms with D&O insurance are positively associated with overinvestment but negatively associated with investment efficiency (Li & Liao, 2014), and D&O insurance increases the likelihood of restating financial statements (Weng, Chen & Chi, 2017), internal control weakness (Chen & Keung, 2018) and the number of key audit matters (KAMs) disclosed by auditors (Lin et al, 2020), and it also weakens the sensitivity of directors' compensation to firm performance (Wang & Chen, 2016). Canadian listed firms with D&O insurance have experienced an increase in the cost of equity and a negative market reaction to increased insurance coverage (Chen, Li & Zou, 2016), increased loan spread (Lin et al, 2013), higher audit fees (Chung et al, 2015), aggressive tax reporting activities (Zeng, 2017) and lower earnings conservatism (Chung & Wynn, 2008), as well as lower announcement period abnormal stock returns during merger and acquisition transactions with significantly higher acquisition premiums but lower post-acquisition business synergies (Lin et al, 2011).…”