2023
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1763481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Discontinuation of Weekly Surveillance Testing on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the NICU

Abstract: Objective Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is a major cause of serious morbidity and mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). There is no clear consensus on infection control measures. Some approaches to MRSA colonization management may be burdensome with unclear benefits. The objective of this study was to determine if stopping weekly MRSA surveillance with active detection and contact isolation (ADI) was associated with a change in infection rate. Study De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, another trial by Derde et al [9] yielded no additional benefit of implementing MRSA screening and contact precautions once effective hand hygiene and chlorhexidine bathing interventions had been implemented. Among studies conducted in neonatal ICUs, a retrospective cohort study and a before-and-after study failed to demonstrate the benefit of AST and contact precautions [10 ▪ ,11 ▪ ]. On the contrary, in a recent prospective cohort analysis of 123 acute care Veterans Affairs Hospitals in the USA, discontinuation of AST and contact precautions for MRSA-infected or colonized patients was associated with higher rates of MRSA HAIs in ICU (0.65 vs. 0.2 per 1000 patient-days; P < 0.001) and non-ICU settings (0.12 vs. 0.07 per 1000 patient-days; P = 0.01) when compared with facilities opting for AST with contact precautions [12 ▪ ].…”
Section: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, another trial by Derde et al [9] yielded no additional benefit of implementing MRSA screening and contact precautions once effective hand hygiene and chlorhexidine bathing interventions had been implemented. Among studies conducted in neonatal ICUs, a retrospective cohort study and a before-and-after study failed to demonstrate the benefit of AST and contact precautions [10 ▪ ,11 ▪ ]. On the contrary, in a recent prospective cohort analysis of 123 acute care Veterans Affairs Hospitals in the USA, discontinuation of AST and contact precautions for MRSA-infected or colonized patients was associated with higher rates of MRSA HAIs in ICU (0.65 vs. 0.2 per 1000 patient-days; P < 0.001) and non-ICU settings (0.12 vs. 0.07 per 1000 patient-days; P = 0.01) when compared with facilities opting for AST with contact precautions [12 ▪ ].…”
Section: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%