2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40893-017-0033-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of disease modifying therapies on brain and grey matter atrophy in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis

Abstract: Background: Progressive brain atrophy is a major feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology and is actually considered a major determinant of the progressive accumulation of physical and cognitive disability in MS patients. Although brain atrophy may have different pathological substrates, several lines of evidence suggest that in disease modifying drug (DMD)-treated MS patients, the higher is the anti-inflammatory effect of the DMD the lower is the progression of brain volume loss, grey matter atrophy and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, in our cohort, 64% of patients were treated with disease‐modifying including primarily first‐line injectables (60%). While injectables also show an effect on brain gray matter atrophy, based on previous studies, we believe that this effect is rather negligible (Favaretto, Lazzarotto, Margoni, Poggiali, & Gallo, ). During the collection of data in this study, there was no approved treatment for PPMS, so that no patient received treatment in this patient group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Nevertheless, in our cohort, 64% of patients were treated with disease‐modifying including primarily first‐line injectables (60%). While injectables also show an effect on brain gray matter atrophy, based on previous studies, we believe that this effect is rather negligible (Favaretto, Lazzarotto, Margoni, Poggiali, & Gallo, ). During the collection of data in this study, there was no approved treatment for PPMS, so that no patient received treatment in this patient group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Indeed, patients of Group A were less commonly treated compared to Group C, whereas the distribution of treatments used in Group C was different compared to Group D. However, it is unclear, if and to which extent this could influence the presence of distinct patterns of VLOT in our patients and consequently our classification results. Nevertheless, the majority of our patients were treated with first-line injectables, which have been shown to have a negligible effect on CNS-atrophy (Favaretto, Lazzarotto, Margoni, Poggiali, & Gallo, 2018). Another potential limitation of our longitudinal experimental design relates to potential volumetric measurement variability due to methodological or physiological factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While injectables also show an effect on brain atrophy, we believe that this effect is rather negligible. 33 Finally, since the study had no T2weighted sequence covering the area of volume measurement over all time points analyzed here, the impact of SC lesions was not assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%