2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of display medium and luminance contrast on memory performance and EEG response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of suppression increases with an increase in illumination levels which results increase of alertness in the subject. Thus, change in the EEG spectra with change in illumination [4,6,7,9,14]. The response curve of percentage suppression of melatonin hormone in increase in amount of lux is shown in below Fig.…”
Section: Physiological Changes When Exposed To Bright Lightmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The percentage of suppression increases with an increase in illumination levels which results increase of alertness in the subject. Thus, change in the EEG spectra with change in illumination [4,6,7,9,14]. The response curve of percentage suppression of melatonin hormone in increase in amount of lux is shown in below Fig.…”
Section: Physiological Changes When Exposed To Bright Lightmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Zhu and Wu (1990) also stated an optimal luminance contrast for VDT was in the range of 1:7 to 1:10. Shieh, Chen, and Wang (2005) found that the effect of luminance contrast on subjective preference was not significant. Many studies (Mills & Weldon, 1986;Travis, Bowles, Seton, & Peppe, 1990;Huang, 2007) yielded similar results that luminance contrast was more important than chromaticity contrast in VDT ~erformance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As for subjective preference, research results were not consistent. Shieh, Chen, and Wang (2005) found that the effect of luminance contrast on subjective preference was not significant. Contrarily, Wang and Chen (2000) and Chen and Lin (2004) stated subjective preference increased with increase in luminance contrast.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Uncomfortable symptoms arising from video display terminal (VDT) tasks may include visual fatigue (Bergqvist & Knave, 1994;Sheedy, 1992) and musculoskeletal complaints (Li & Buckle, 1999), and much research on VDT tasks has been reported. Questionnaires have been widely used to investigate psychological fatigue during VDT tasks (Dillon & Emurian, 1995;Dillon, Kleinman, Choi, & Bias, 2005;Duffy & Chan, 2002;Stüdeli & Menozzi, 2003), whereas other studies have gathered physiological signals by electroencephalography (Shieh, Chen, & Wang, 2005), electromyography (Balci & Aghazadeh, 2004;Murata, Uetake, Matsumoto, & Takasawa, 2003;Park, Kim, & Shin, 2000;Seghers, Jochen, & Spaepen, 2003), and critical flicker fusion (Chi & Lin, 1998;Takahashi et al, 2001) to measure physiological fatigue. Heart rate (HR) has been measured in VDT tasks at low load levels (Higuchi, Motohashi, Liu, Ahara, & Kaneko, 2003;Takahashi et al, 2001); however, the change in HR is not remarkable when it is compared with the high loading task like HR recovery after exhausted exercise (Du et al, 2005;Platisa, Mazic, Nestorovic, & Gal, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%