1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02436333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of domestication on brain structure and behavior in mammals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was surprising in light of evidence from environmental enrichment studies showing increases in synapses and brain volume in rodent brains that had experienced enriched environments, and from volumetric brain studies which indicate that wild animals have larger brains compared to their domestic counterparts [Ebinger, 1974;Kruska, 1988;Mohammed et al, 2002;Faherty et al, 2003;Kolb et al, 2003;Gelfo et al, 2009]. However, the wild versus domestic comparisons in these studies were of volume differences for either the entire brain or gross structures (cortex, cerebellum and remaining areas), whereas our study compared smaller subdivisions of the brain, such as the size of individual cortical sensory areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This result was surprising in light of evidence from environmental enrichment studies showing increases in synapses and brain volume in rodent brains that had experienced enriched environments, and from volumetric brain studies which indicate that wild animals have larger brains compared to their domestic counterparts [Ebinger, 1974;Kruska, 1988;Mohammed et al, 2002;Faherty et al, 2003;Kolb et al, 2003;Gelfo et al, 2009]. However, the wild versus domestic comparisons in these studies were of volume differences for either the entire brain or gross structures (cortex, cerebellum and remaining areas), whereas our study compared smaller subdivisions of the brain, such as the size of individual cortical sensory areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Such intraspecific variability of relative brain size has been previously demonstrated in domestic animals, especially when dwarfs have evolved within a species [10,12,22,25]. The restriction of “postcranial growth” in small dog breeds is of importance since the postnatal increase in brain mass finishes around six month and completion of skeletal growth in dogs occurs later in postnatal development [27-29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Domestication alters the phenotype, behavior, and brain size in many mammals including rodents (Kruska 1988) and induces changes in, for example, neuroendocrine and neurotransmitter systems (Trut et al 2009). These systems have been shown to be important players in the modulation of AHN (McEwen et al 2002;Pathania et al 2010).…”
Section: Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis In Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 99%