1989
DOI: 10.3758/bf03334624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dominance status on defensive burying in male mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dominant males primarily show higher levels of defensive burying than subordinate males, who more frequently display a crouch/freezing tendency as a reactive defensive style. Thus, the determinant factor in these differences in defensive strategies is a history of subordination followed by defeat [Martinez et al, 1998;Meek et al, 1989], and also the establishment of social dominance relationships per se [Arakawa, 2006;Blanchard et al, 1998]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominant males primarily show higher levels of defensive burying than subordinate males, who more frequently display a crouch/freezing tendency as a reactive defensive style. Thus, the determinant factor in these differences in defensive strategies is a history of subordination followed by defeat [Martinez et al, 1998;Meek et al, 1989], and also the establishment of social dominance relationships per se [Arakawa, 2006;Blanchard et al, 1998]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%