2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-013-1103-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on the intensity-response function of electroretinographic b- and d-waves in light-adapted eyes

Abstract: The effects of dopamine receptor blockade by sulpiride (D2-class antagonist) and sulpiride plus SCH 23390 (D1-class antagonist) on the V - log I function of the electroretinographic (ERG) b- and d-waves were investigated in light-adapted frog eyes. Sulpiride significantly decreased the absolute sensitivity of the b- and d-waves. The amplitude of the both waves was diminished over the whole intensity range studied. A similar effect on the b-, but not d-wave amplitude was seen during the perfusion with sulpiride… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2A, B). This amplitude decline was probably produced by the adaptational effect of the test stimulation itself and it was also seen in other ERG recordings in dark adapted frog eyecups (Popova and Kupenova, 2016;Kupenova et al, 2017). Because the d-wave amplitude diminished to a greater extent than that of the b-wave ( Fig.…”
Section: Intensity-response Function Of Control Experimentssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…2A, B). This amplitude decline was probably produced by the adaptational effect of the test stimulation itself and it was also seen in other ERG recordings in dark adapted frog eyecups (Popova and Kupenova, 2016;Kupenova et al, 2017). Because the d-wave amplitude diminished to a greater extent than that of the b-wave ( Fig.…”
Section: Intensity-response Function Of Control Experimentssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The absolute and relative sensitivities of the responses were not significantly changed during the blocker application (Table I). These results indicate that 40 μM sulpiride had no significant influence on the V -log I function of the light-adapted turtle ERG, which contrasted with its suppressive action of the amplitude of the light-adapted frog ERG (Popova 2014b). We did not find any significant effects of 40 μM sulpiride on the time characteristics of the turtle ERG waves as well.…”
Section: Effects Of 40 μM Sulpiride On the Intensity-response Function Of Turtle Ergmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The eyecup preparations were placed in a chamber where they were continuously superfused with Ringer solution (NaCl 110 mM, KCl 2.6 mM, NaHCO 3 10 mM, CaCl 2 2 mM, MgCl 2 2 mM, Glucose 2 mM; HCl 0.5 mM to adjust pH to 7.8) at a rate of 1.6 -1.8 ml/min, temperature 18 -20 0 C and supplied with moistened O 2 (for details see Kupenova et al 2010, Popova 2014b). The D2-class receptors were blocked by sulpiride (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX).…”
Section: Subjects and Drug Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations