2019
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dredging on the vegetation in a small lowland river

Abstract: BackgroundConventional river engineering operations have a substantial influence on the fluvial ecosystem. Regulation and channelization generally reduce the physical heterogeneity of river beds and banks and the heterogeneity of habitats. They determine the character, diversity and species richness of plant communities. The effect of river regulation on vegetation has been repeatedly investigated, but few studies have been conducted within reaches of previously regulated rivers. The aim of this work is to exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, it would inhibit the eutrophication processes, and secondly, it would reduce the colonization of outlets in high trophy lakes by alien and invasive dreissenids. Furthermore, the regulation and straightening of outlet beds increase the current velocity and decrease the ecological status (Bączyk et al., 2018 ; Stępień et al., 2019 ), which may also favor the colonization of outlets by the zebra mussel. In this case, the most optimal solution is to promote renaturalization of outlet beds and create meanders as well as riffle sequences that reduce or diversify current velocity (Palmer et al., 2010 ; Wohl et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it would inhibit the eutrophication processes, and secondly, it would reduce the colonization of outlets in high trophy lakes by alien and invasive dreissenids. Furthermore, the regulation and straightening of outlet beds increase the current velocity and decrease the ecological status (Bączyk et al., 2018 ; Stępień et al., 2019 ), which may also favor the colonization of outlets by the zebra mussel. In this case, the most optimal solution is to promote renaturalization of outlet beds and create meanders as well as riffle sequences that reduce or diversify current velocity (Palmer et al., 2010 ; Wohl et al., 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A separate assessment of this factor during our study yielded data supporting the relationship between riparian habitat disturbance and the macroinvertebrate community in both types of aquatic ecosystems. Such changes in macroinvertebrate communities were registered in the Krąpiel River after hydrotechnical works, which resulted in changes in the vegetation cover (Szlauer-Łukaszewska and Zawal 2014;Stępień et al 2015Stępień et al , 2019Zawal et al 2015aZawal et al , b, 2016aBuczyński et al 2016;Dąbkowski et al 2016;Płaska et al 2016;Stryjecki et al 2016).…”
Section: Environmental Difference Between Rural and Urban Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-disturbance release from competition and more underutilised resources may also result in more viable functional strategies for coexistence, increasing functional turnover [12,143]. For example, Stępie ń et al [144] recorded rapid post-dredging recovery to pre-disturbance levels (~2 years) for temperate riparian vegetation. Initial succession by ruderal therophytes and invasive species with distinct functional traits was followed by an increase in pre-disturbance species in the second year of succession [144].…”
Section: Taxonomic-β and Functional-βmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Stępie ń et al [144] recorded rapid post-dredging recovery to pre-disturbance levels (~2 years) for temperate riparian vegetation. Initial succession by ruderal therophytes and invasive species with distinct functional traits was followed by an increase in pre-disturbance species in the second year of succession [144]. Therefore, similarly to taxonomic-β, the high levels of functional-β in this study, driven primarily by turnover, might be primarily explained by stochastic biotic interactions driven by probabilistic initial community assemblages, with additional increases in viable functional strategies in disturbed sites.…”
Section: Taxonomic-β and Functional-βmentioning
confidence: 99%