Abstract-It is not established whether behavioral interventions add benefit to pharmacological therapy for hypertension.We hypothesized that behavioral neurocardiac training (BNT) with heart rate variability biofeedback would reduce blood pressure further by modifying vagal heart rate modulation during reactivity and recovery from standardized cognitive tasks ("mental stress"). This randomized, controlled trial enrolled 65 patients with uncomplicated hypertension to BNT or active control (autogenic relaxation), with six 1-hour sessions over 2 months with home practice. Outcomes were analyzed with linear mixed models that adjusted for antihypertensive drugs. BNT reduced daytime and 24-hour systolic blood pressures (Ϫ2.4Ϯ0.9 mm Hg, Pϭ0.009, and Ϫ2.1Ϯ0.9 mm Hg, Pϭ0.03, respectively) and pulse pressures (Ϫ1.7Ϯ0.6 mm Hg, Pϭ0.004, and Ϫ1.4Ϯ0.6 mm Hg, Pϭ0.02, respectively). No effect was observed for controls (PϾ0.10 for all indices). BNT also increased RR-high-frequency power (0.15 to 0.40 Hz; Pϭ0.01) and RR interval (PϽ0.001) during cognitive tasks. Among controls, high-frequency power was unchanged (Pϭ0.29), and RR interval decreased (Pϭ0.03). Neither intervention altered spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (PϾ0.10). In contrast to relaxation therapy, BNT with heart rate variability biofeedback modestly lowers ambulatory blood pressure during wakefulness, and it augments tonic vagal heart rate modulation. It is unknown whether efficacy of this treatment can be improved with biofeedback of baroreflex gain. BNT, alone or as an adjunct to drug therapy, may represent a promising new intervention for hypertension. Key Words: hypertension Ⅲ heart rate variability Ⅲ baroreflex Ⅲ clinical trials Ⅲ biofeedback Ⅲ relaxation Ⅲ stress T he hypothesis that a behavioral intervention augments the hypotensive effect of pharmacological treatment of hypertension was tested in a randomized, controlled trial first by Patel and North. 1 Training in yoga-induced relaxation with electrodermal biofeedback significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BPs; SBP and DBP), whereas no change was observed with self-guided relaxation as the control intervention. The therapeutic model for this approach can be traced to early research by Smirk, who recognized that BP could be lowered to a basal level by an emotionally calm or "desensitized" state and that emotional and environmental factors contributed to the "supplemental" elevation that was observed during casual BP measurements. 2 It was subsequently asserted that repeated exposure to a "hypometabolic" state, popularly known as the relaxation response, could lower BP by reducing environmentally driven sympathetic overactivity. 1,3 Commentary at the time concerning a behavioral treatment for hypertension focused on 2 issues: the need for differentiation between the depressor effect of biofeedback-assisted relaxation and any placebo response 4 and whether active training with biofeedback augmented or interfered with the passive mental attitude that was considered necessary for ther...