2021
DOI: 10.47391/jpma.01398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of dry needling in lower extremity myofascial trigger points: systematic review

Abstract: Objective: This systematic review was conducted to explore the current evidences on effects of trigger point dry needling as a treatment strategy on pain and range of motion among the subjects with lower extremity myofascial trigger areas. Methods: A systematic review was performed and searched databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and PEDro. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Inclusion and exclusion of studies were made according to PICOS format. Ten studies were recruited for assessment bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, three studies showed no improvement in pain, and four showed no improvement in ROM. 8 We observed a clinically significant lower pain intensity in the DN group, consistent with their findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, three studies showed no improvement in pain, and four showed no improvement in ROM. 8 We observed a clinically significant lower pain intensity in the DN group, consistent with their findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This evidence, however, is of low quality according to the quality assessment scores. A systematic review by Khan et al 8 examining the effects of DN on patients with lower extremity myofascial trigger points due to several conditions revealed that six out of ten included studies were in favor of DN. In six studies that demonstrated a positive effect of DN therapy on pain outcomes, the mean value of VAS was higher than the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations