Effects of Dyadic Interventions on Quality of Life among Cancer Patients: An Integrative Review

Sharma, Abha; Saneha, Chongjit; Phligbua, Warunee

doi:10.4103/apjon.apjon_63_20

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dyadic psychosocial interventions provide the opportunity to target interpersonal cancer-related concerns in a more efficient and perhaps more effective manner than individual interventions. Prior reviews showed that dyadic psychosocial interventions are feasible, acceptable and effective at individual and dyadic level [17][18][19]. This update of the existing literature identified 12 recent studies, which provide additional support for the utility of dyadic interventions in the context of cancer.…”

Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning

confidence: 84%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dyadic psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer and their caregivers: an update

Tiete

Porter

2022

Current Opinion in Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of reviewCancer causes significant impacts on patients and their caregivers. Cancer is also associated with multiple physical and emotional challenges for the patient-caregiver dyad. This patient-caregiver dyad should be considered as a unit of care by healthcare providers and supported through dedicated psychological interventions.Recent findingsTwelve studies that tested dyadic interventions aiming to support patient-caregiver dyads were identified from the period April 2020 to December 2021. Studies were predominantly randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm pilot studies. Half of the interventions were online. Interventions were mostly focused on dyadic adjustment and appeared to be acceptable, feasible and globally effective. However, effects were evident predominantly on individual rather than dyadic outcomes. The interventions targeted either individual psychological outcomes, such as depression and anxiety, and are reported to be effective or various individual outcomes and also appeared to be effective. However, there was a large heterogeneity in quality and sample sizes across all intervention types.SummaryDyadic psychological interventions may be an effective support for patient-caregiver dyads dealing with multiple physical and emotional challenges. Online interventions and the variability of intervention types may respond to dyads specific needs, but though need to be rigorously evaluated through powered RCTs.

show abstract

Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning

confidence: 84%

“…The current review aims to identify recent literature (published in 2020–2021) about psychosocial interventions for patient-caregiver dyads and provide an update to existing reviews of studies published before that time [19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dyadic psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer and their caregivers: an update

Tiete

Porter

2022

Current Opinion in Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interventions in cancer and heart failure dyads showing improvements for both caregiver and care recipient also suggests that this association can be positively altered ( 34 , 35 ). However, few studies ( 13 , 14 ) have investigated the direct impact of a caregiver intervention on care recipient outcomes in PLWD.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How both positive and burdensome caregiver experiences are associated with care recipient cognitive performance: Evidence from the National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving

Wennberg

Anderson²,

Cagnin³

et al. 2023

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionBeing an informal caregiver to a person with chronic disease, including persons living with dementia (PLWD), is a big role to take on and many caregivers experience both substantial burden and emotional reward related to caregiving. Care recipient factors (e.g., behavioral symptoms) are associated with caregiver experience. However, the relationship between caregiver and care recipient is bidirectional, so it is likely that caregiver factors impact the care recipient, though few studies have investigated this.MethodsIn the 2017 round of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) and National Study of Caregiving (NSOC), we studied 1,210 care dyads-−170 PLWD dyads and 1,040 without dementia dyads. Care recipients completed immediate and delayed word list memory tasks, the Clock Drawing Test, and a self-rated memory rating, while caregivers were interviewed about their caregiving experiences using a 34-item questionnaire. Using principal component analysis, we created a caregiver experience score with three components—Practical Care Burden, Positive Care Experiences, and Emotional Care Burden. We then investigated the cross-sectional association between caregiver experience components and care recipient cognitive test performance using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, race, and depressive and anxiety symptoms.ResultsAmong PLWD dyads, a higher caregiver Positive Care Experiences score was associated with better care recipient performance on the delayed word recall (B = 0.20, 95% CI 0.05, 0.36) and Clock Draw (B = 0.12, 95% CI 0.01, 0.24) tests while higher Emotional Care Burden score was associated with worse self-rated memory score (B = −0.19, 95% CI −0.39, −0.003). Among participants without dementia, higher Practical Care Burden score was associated with poorer care recipient performance on the immediate (B = −0.07, 95% CI −0.12, −0.01) and delayed (B = −0.10, 95% CI −0.16, −0.05) word recall tests.DiscussionThese findings support the concept that caregiving is bidirectional within the dyad and that positive variables can positively impact both members of the dyad. This suggests that caregiving interventions should target the caregiver and recipient both individually and as a unit, with the goal of holistically improving outcomes for both.

show abstract

“…The existing forms of dyadic interventions mainly use psychoeducation, positive thinking, yoga, and Tai chi etc. (Sharma et al, 2021). Concerning the efficacy of dyadic-based physical activity interventions on CRF, there were fewer studies and the evidence of their effectiveness is insufficient.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of dyadic-based physical activity intervention on cancer-related fatigue among cancer survivors: A scoping review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveCancer-related fatigue is one of the most common adverse reactions to cancer survivors, which has a significant impact on the daily life. As a traumatic event, cancer not only brings great physical and mental harm to patients, but also poses a threat to the physical and psychological health of caregivers. Current studies have shown that physical activity improves cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivors. And studies have suggested that dyadic interventions are more effective in improving patient outcomes and may also provide some benefits to caregivers. But the literature on the effects of dyadic-based physical activity on improving cancer-related fatigue has not been synthesized. This scoping review described the scope and impact of studies on cancer-related fatigue with dyadic-based physical activity interventions.MethodsSix databases which is PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL and Medline were searched for all studies of dyadic-based physical activity interventions with outcome measures including cancer-related fatigue published since the inception of the databases through May 2022. The search strategy was developed based on PICO principles.ResultsThis article includes 6 pre and post-test designs and 2 randomized controlled trial design. The majority of participants were survivors with breast and lung cancer. The overall results showed that the effectiveness of dyadic-based physical activity interventions in improving cancer-related fatigue was unsatisfactory.ConclusionsThis scoping review suggests that current dyadic-based physical activity interventions are not well-researched among cancer survivors. In the future, more high-quality studies with more sophisticated and rigorous interventions are needed.

show abstract

Effects of Dyadic Interventions on Quality of Life among Cancer Patients: An Integrative Review

Cited by 11 publications

References 53 publications

Dyadic psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer and their caregivers: an update

Dyadic psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer and their caregivers: an update

How both positive and burdensome caregiver experiences are associated with care recipient cognitive performance: Evidence from the National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving

Effects of dyadic-based physical activity intervention on cancer-related fatigue among cancer survivors: A scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About