2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2019.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of early diagenesis on Mg isotopes in dolomite: The roles of Mn(IV)-reduction and recrystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different lines of evidence have more recently pointed to dissolved Mn and Zn as potentially important catalyzers of early diagenetic ordered dolomite nucleation (Daye et al ., 2019; Li et al ., 2019a; Vandeginste et al ., 2019). In fresh coastal aquifers, dissolved Mn concentrations are generally <100 nmol kg −1 but are often comparatively enriched in the higher salinity reducing groundwaters (Table 1).…”
Section: Biogeochemical Transformations In the Mixing Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different lines of evidence have more recently pointed to dissolved Mn and Zn as potentially important catalyzers of early diagenetic ordered dolomite nucleation (Daye et al ., 2019; Li et al ., 2019a; Vandeginste et al ., 2019). In fresh coastal aquifers, dissolved Mn concentrations are generally <100 nmol kg −1 but are often comparatively enriched in the higher salinity reducing groundwaters (Table 1).…”
Section: Biogeochemical Transformations In the Mixing Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnesium isotopes in marine carbonate have been applied to reconstruct the Mg isotopic and chemical composition of ancient seawater (Crockford et al, 2020;Fantle and Higgins, 2014;Gothmann et al, 2017;Higgins and Schrag, 2012;Hu et al, 2019;Li et al, 2015;Li et al, 2019;Pogge von Strandmann et al, 2014). However, the use of carbonates as Mg isotope archive of seawater faces several challenges, including :…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of samples matched the in‐house standard to within 10%. The δsans-serifMsans-serifg26 $\delta {}^{26}\mathsf{M}\mathsf{g}$ of the in‐house standard was determined as −0.67‰ ± 0.1‰ relative to international standard DSM3 (Li et al., 2011, 2019). All Mg isotopic data were normalized to DSM3 using conventional delta notation to express per thousand deviations from DSM3: δ26Mg()=false(Mg26/Mg24false)samplefalse(Mg26/Mg24false)DSM3(Mg26/Mg24)DSM3×1,000 ${\delta }^{26}\text{Mg}(\text{{\perthousand}})=\frac{{({}^{26}\text{Mg}/{}^{24}\text{Mg})}_{\text{sample}}-{({}^{26}\text{Mg}/{}^{24}\text{Mg})}_{\text{DSM}3}}{{({}^{26}\text{Mg}/{}^{24}\text{Mg})}_{\text{DSM}3}}\times 1,000$ …”
Section: Materials and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of samples matched the in-house standard to within 10%. The 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 26 𝖬𝖬𝖬𝖬 of the in-house standard was determined as −0.67‰ ± 0.1‰ relative to international standard DSM3 (Li et al, 2011(Li et al, , 2019. All Mg isotopic data were normalized to DSM3 using conventional delta notation to express per thousand deviations from DSM3:…”
Section: Mg Isotope Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%