2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16071158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Early Frequent Nephrology Care on Emergency Department Visits among Patients with End-stage Renal Disease

Abstract: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the association between predialysis nephrology care status and emergency department (ED) events among patients with end-stage renal disease. Data pertaining to 76,702 patients who began dialysis treatment between 1999 and 2010 were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan (NHIRD). The patients were divided into three groups based on the timing of the first nephrology care visit prior to the initiation of maintenance dialysis, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…63 These findings suggest that reducing rates of missed dialysis may help reduce ED visits, although predictors of both missed dialysis and increased ED visits warrant further investigation. Although we did not identify any interventions in this subgroup, Chen et al 21 found that more frequent predialysis care by a nephrologist was associated with lower ED visit rates following HD initiation, suggesting that optimized predialysis care may help HD patients avoid the ED. Furthermore, Harel et al 3 observed that dialysis centers in Canada frequently share records systems with hospitals and have lower hospitalization rates for their patients than American dialysis centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…63 These findings suggest that reducing rates of missed dialysis may help reduce ED visits, although predictors of both missed dialysis and increased ED visits warrant further investigation. Although we did not identify any interventions in this subgroup, Chen et al 21 found that more frequent predialysis care by a nephrologist was associated with lower ED visit rates following HD initiation, suggesting that optimized predialysis care may help HD patients avoid the ED. Furthermore, Harel et al 3 observed that dialysis centers in Canada frequently share records systems with hospitals and have lower hospitalization rates for their patients than American dialysis centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Higher ED utilization was predicted by missed dialysis, longer interdialytic intervals, dialysis through catheters instead of arteriovenous fistulas, dialysis initiation, frequent postdialysis weights above target, prior hospitalization for dialysis, and infrequent predialysis care. 3,7,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Higher ED utilization was also predicted by the following social determinants of health: racial segregation, lower community income, female sex, Black race, reliance on public transport, and lower health literacy. [26][27][28][29][30] The undocumented and social determinants of health concept subgroups were treated separately to reflect the unique barriers to care that undocumented persons face in the United States, such as their ineligibility for Medicare.…”
Section: Plain-language Summarymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, CKD patients with diabetes mellitus are also referred early to increase the chances of survival and disease treatment (Smart et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2020). Other studies have also reported the early referral of diabetes mellitus patients before the start of dialysis (Chen et al, 2019;Mutatiri et al, 2022). Kessler et al (Kessler et al, 2003) and Kinchen et al (Kinchen et al, 2002) noted an average time of 4 to 12 months for referral of diabetes mellitus patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, even if the indications of several nephrology societies, including ours, are in favour of early identification of all cases of CKD, no randomized study has assessed the advantages of such a demanding policy [ 59–61 ]. We do, however, know the effects of a late CKD diagnosis, which involves lost opportunities for individuals and for society [ 62–64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%