Effects of early maxillary orthopaedics in coordination with delayed surgery for cleft lip and palate

Hotz, M; Gnoinski, Wanda

doi:10.1016/s0301-0503(79)80041-7

Cited by 161 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Since McNeil, many researchers have published their own methods for obtaining proper growth and development of the face, and for improving surgery results. The Hotz appliance, and then the Latham device were introduced for aligning the cleft segments [18][19][20][21][22][23]. Some authors used a combination of these appliances like in the Brogan technique, which combines the developmental potentials.…”

Section: Presurgical Infant Orthopedic Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some authors used a combination of these appliances like in the Brogan technique, which combines the developmental potentials. Therefore, the Zurich approach, after a lip operation is performed at the age of 6 months, palate repair is postponed until 5 years of age [22]. These authors concluded that orthopedic guidance combined with optimal timing of surgery has beneficial effects.…”

Section: Presurgical Infant Orthopedic Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Presurgical Infant Orthopedics for Cleft Lip and Palate: A Review

Esenlik¹

2015

Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Presurgical Infant Orthopedic Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Presurgical Infant Orthopedic Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Presurgical Infant Orthopedics for Cleft Lip and Palate: A Review

Esenlik¹

2015

Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Clinical course. Feeding difficulty was improved by using the Hotz type palatal plate (Hotz and Gnoinski, 1979) to the cleft palate. However, the infant suffered repeated upper airway inflammation, which was occasionally complicated K. ONOet aL Unit: mm with pneumonia.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Partial monosomy 5p and partial trisomy 5q due to paternal pericentric inversion of chromosome 5

et al. 1993

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryA male infant with partial monosomy 5p and partial trisomy 5q due to paternal pericentric inversion of chromosome 5 (46,XY, rec(5), dup q,inv(5)(p15.1q35.1)pat)is reported together with the oral findings. The phenotype was chiefly the cri-du-chat syndrome. Severe retardation of mental and motor development, microencephaly, cardiac malformation, crying and facial appearance unique to the cri-du-chat syndrome were observed. Perioral and intraoral findings included thin upper lip, downturning corners of mouth, micrognathia, shallow palate, and cleft of soft palate. Anterior deciduous teeth were small and canine deciduous teeth were conic. The row of deciduous teeth showed a flat arch-like shape that was very wide but short in length. No abnormality was noted in the number of deciduous teeth or the timing of eruption. Key Wordspericentric inversion, recombinant chromosome, double aneuploidy, partial monosomy 5p, partial trisomy 5q INTRODUCTIONPartial monosomy 5p and partial trisomy 5q originating from the parental pericentric inversion of chromosome 5 is a rare and complex chromosomal aberration, and only nine cases, namely, eight cases in six families (Faed et aL, 1972;Ebbin et al., 1979;Beemer et aL, 1984;Miyazaki et aL, 1985;Schroeder et al., 1986;Sonoda et aL, 1989) and one fetus (Martin et al., 1988), have been reported since this condition was first reported by Faed et al. in 1972.The authors encountered a male infant with partial monosomy 5p and partial trisomy 5q due to paternal pericentric inversion of chromosome 5. Detailed oral findings are reported.Received March 4, 1993; Revised version accepted June 24, 1993.

show abstract

“…Trusler et al, 1955;Kilner, 1958;Honig, 1964;Stark, 1968), whereas others take the stand that operating on a growing maxilla should, in principle, be avoided, and close the hard palate at a later age (e.g. Schweckendiek, 1955;Widmaier, 1966;Hotz and Perko, 1974;Perko, 1979;Hotz and Gnoinski, 1979).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%