1968
DOI: 10.1093/jee/61.5.1446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Early-, Mid-, and Late-Season Infestations of Two-Spotted Spider Mites on the Yield of Cotton123

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trends of mite population increase are undoubtedly most critical early in the season before about 700°D have elapsed. Furr and Pfrimmer (1968) and Mistric (1969) reported that early mite infestations caused greater reductions in yield than did late infestations. Once mite numbers begin to explode, it is extremely difficult for natural enemies to regain effective control.…”
Section: Natural Enemies and Varietal Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trends of mite population increase are undoubtedly most critical early in the season before about 700°D have elapsed. Furr and Pfrimmer (1968) and Mistric (1969) reported that early mite infestations caused greater reductions in yield than did late infestations. Once mite numbers begin to explode, it is extremely difficult for natural enemies to regain effective control.…”
Section: Natural Enemies and Varietal Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigators have documented reduced yield resulting from spider mite damage to cotton (Canerday and Arant 1964;Furr and Pfrimmer 1968;Mistric 1969;Roussel et al 1951). The degree of yield loss in the susceptible Acala SJ-2 was a function of mite density.…”
Section: Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, we may assume that the effect of T. ogmophallos on peanut yield might occur at any of the reproductive stages within peanut development. Conversely, such yield reductions were not observed for late-season infestations of T. urticae in cotton (Furr and Pfrimmer, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In general, the greater the rate of infestation, the greater the expected reduction in yield. Investigators have also demonstrated that time of spider mite infestation (i-e., initiation or establishment) is directly related to yield loss (Furr & Pfrimmer 1968, Mistric 1969. Regressing P(1) on a physiological time unit such as degree days (DD) > 12°C from planting, will produce a straight line, the slope of which is an estimate of infestation rate.…”
Section: L) In the San Joaquin Valley Of California Andmentioning
confidence: 99%