2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of eight different ligament property datasets on biomechanics of a lumbar L4-L5 finite element model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An attempt to account for physiological validity was recently made by Naserkhaki et al (2018) by comparing the performance of various ligament data sets in recreating experimental results. They found that the choice of ligament characteristics can cause certain variations on the model output, because of the large variation in the individual force-strain relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An attempt to account for physiological validity was recently made by Naserkhaki et al (2018) by comparing the performance of various ligament data sets in recreating experimental results. They found that the choice of ligament characteristics can cause certain variations on the model output, because of the large variation in the individual force-strain relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely accepted, based on experiments on isolated ligaments (Chazal et al 1985;Nachemson and Evans 1968;Rissanen 1960;Tkaczuk 1968;Waters and Morris 1973) and functional units (Dumas et al 1987;Myklebust et al 1988;Panjabi et al 1982;Pintar et al 1992), that this force-strain relation consists of a nonlinear toe zone with a seemingly nonlinear-linear transition at higher strains. However, large variations between different data sets (see 4 Discussion) and thus the characteristics lead to unforeseeable variations in the model output as recently shown in Naserkhaki et al (2018). Naturally, the question arises which ligament characteristics should be incorporated in order to account for preferably physiological behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The annulus fibers and ligamentum flavum (LF) were not included in the FE models. Although LF has the role of resisting flexion motion, it is shown that the spinal motion is still preserved after the removal of LF . On the other hand, supra supinous ligament (SSL), the primary ligament for resisting flexion motion, was included in our FE model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although LF has the role of resisting flexion motion, it is shown that the spinal motion is still preserved after the removal of LF. 34 On the other hand, supra supinous ligament (SSL), the primary ligament for resisting flexion motion, 35 was included in our FE model. In addition, other studies also used simple disc models without including annulus fibers to analyze biomechanical effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%