2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02457-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Electrode Diameter and Contact Material on Signal Morphology of Gastric Bioelectrical Slow Wave Recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrode specifications such as the diameter and material of the electrode contacts affect the amplitude and SNR measurements (McAdams 2006). Materials such as silver and gold, which were utilized in the CNA and FPC arrays are unlikely to have a significant impact, but the difference in diameters (and thereby also contact areas) of the two arrays are likely to play a greater role (O'Grady et al 2009, Kamat et al 2020). The CNA electrodes were over four times smaller in diameter than the FPC electrodes (0.07 versus 0.3 mm) providing a plausible explanation for the 31% and 46% reduction in amplitude and SNR, respectively, noted during simultaneous serosal data collection via both the CNA and FPC arrays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrode specifications such as the diameter and material of the electrode contacts affect the amplitude and SNR measurements (McAdams 2006). Materials such as silver and gold, which were utilized in the CNA and FPC arrays are unlikely to have a significant impact, but the difference in diameters (and thereby also contact areas) of the two arrays are likely to play a greater role (O'Grady et al 2009, Kamat et al 2020). The CNA electrodes were over four times smaller in diameter than the FPC electrodes (0.07 versus 0.3 mm) providing a plausible explanation for the 31% and 46% reduction in amplitude and SNR, respectively, noted during simultaneous serosal data collection via both the CNA and FPC arrays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the data were aligned, several parameters (Figure 1E) were calculated for each slow wave captured during the Reveal LINQ recording period. SNR was calculated using a previously reported method 29 To determine downstroke width and amplitude, the peak and trough of each downstroke were estimated using a zero‐crossing technique described previously 30 . The first derivative of the signal was calculated using a two‐point central difference scheme, and the closest zero‐crossing positions on either side of the AT were taken as the index of the peak and trough.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%