Background
Mapping resolution is influenced by electrode size and interelectrode spacing. The aims of this study were to establish normal electrogram criteria for 1mm multielectrode-mapping catheters (Pentaray®) in the ventricle and to compare its mapping resolution within scar to standard 3.5mm catheters (Smart-Touch Thermocool®).
Methods and Results
Three healthy swine and 11 swine with healed myocardial infarction underwent sequential mapping of the left ventricle with both catheters. Bipolar voltage amplitude in healthy tissue was similar between 3.5mm and 1mm multielectrode catheters with a 5th percentile of 1.61mV and 1.48mV, respectively. In swine with healed infarction, the total area of low bipolar voltage amplitude (defined as <1.5mV) was 22.5% smaller using 1mm multielectrode catheters (21.7cm2 versus 28.0cm2; p=0.003). This was more evident in the area of “dense scar” (bipolar amplitude <0.5mV) with a 47% smaller very low voltage area identified using 1mm electrode catheters (7.1cm2 vs. 15.2cm2; p=0.003). In this region, 1mm multielectrode catheters recorded higher voltage amplitude (0.72±0.81mV vs. 0.30±0.12mV, p<0.001). Importantly, 27% of these “dense scar” electrograms showed distinct triphasic electrograms when mapped using a 1mm multielectrode catheter compared with fractionated multicomponent electrogram recorded with the 3.5mm electrode catheter. In 8 mapped reentrant VTs, the circuits included regions of preserved myocardial tissue “channels” identified with 1mm multielectrode catheters but not 3.5mm electrode catheters. Pacing threshold within the area of low voltage was lower with 1mm electrode catheters (0.9±1.3mV vs. 3.8±3.7mV, p=0.001).
Conclusions
Mapping with small closely spaced electrode catheters can improve mapping resolution within areas of low voltage.