1952
DOI: 10.1037/h0061303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of electroshock convulsions upon the learning performance of monkeys: I. Object-quality discrimination learning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sharp contrast, intraproblem information, upon which solution of the current problem depends, was stored transiently with sizable retention loss occurring within 4 min. This result replicates those reported by Braun, Patton, and Barnes (1952) and Bessemer and Stollnitz (1971) for the rhesus monkey. This suggests that the response-strategy or conditional discrimination model, which emphasizes the importance of memory traces for previous trial events as discriminative stimuli, is consistent with the ODLS behavior of both species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In sharp contrast, intraproblem information, upon which solution of the current problem depends, was stored transiently with sizable retention loss occurring within 4 min. This result replicates those reported by Braun, Patton, and Barnes (1952) and Bessemer and Stollnitz (1971) for the rhesus monkey. This suggests that the response-strategy or conditional discrimination model, which emphasizes the importance of memory traces for previous trial events as discriminative stimuli, is consistent with the ODLS behavior of both species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…When ECS was administered 30 days following the last acquisition trial (70 days after the first trial), a deficit appeared temporarily on a subsequent retention test, but the deficit disappeared with further training. Braun, Patton, and Barnes (1952), using monkeys, gave 515 object-quality discrimination problems on the Wisconsin General Test Apparatus which took approximately 56 days to complete. By the end of this experience the subjects had developed a highly efficient learning set and could learn a new problem much quicker than they did at the beginning of training.…”
Section: The Learning-ecs Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both primates (see Braun et aL , 1952;Chow, "1954;Strong, 1959) and blue jays (see Kamil et aL, 1973) showed high percentages of correct responses on Trial 2 following breaks in training ranging from 7 to 30 weeks. It remains to be seen if rats can maintain performance on Trial 2 following a more extensive (30-week) break.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations with rhesus monkeys have shown that primates are able to maintain high percentages of correct (> 80%) and better than chance performance on Trial 2 following breaks in testing ranging between 7 and 30 weeks (see Braun, Patton , & Barnes, 1952;Chow, 1954;Strong, 1959). Additionally, long-term retention of learning set (67% correct on Trial 2) has also been found in blue jays following a 5-month break in testing (Kamil, Lougee, & Shulman, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%