1989
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.5403.356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Elicitation Procedures on the Narratives of Normal and Closed Head-Injured Adults

Abstract: Stories were elicited under two conditions--story retelling and story generation--from a group of 23 normal young adults and 4 closed head-injured (CHI) adults who had reached a high level of language recovery. Sentence production, intersentential cohesion, and story grammar were analyzed. The results demonstrated that the two elicitation tasks differentially influenced the performance of both normal and CHI subjects at all levels of analysis, and the two groups differed in the cohesive and story grammar measu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In young children with autism, a correlation between impaired performance on an EF task (spatial reversal) and an aspect of social communication (joint attention) has been reported (McEvoy, Rogers, & Pennington, 1993). Abstract language processing and discourse behavior are often disrupted in individuals with injuries to the frontal lobes (e.g., Liles, Coelho, Duffy, & Zalagens, 1989;Pearce, McDonald, & Coltheart, 1998), which are key to intact executive function (e.g., Mishkin, 1964;Iversen & Mishkin, 1970;Fuster, 1980;Diamond & Goldman-Rakic, 1989;Shallice, 1982;Milner, 1963Milner, , 1982. Likewise, there is a considerable relationship between prefrontal brain injury and social dysfunction, including theory of mind and social discourse (Anderson, Damasio, Tranel, & Damasio, 2000;Barkely, Grodzinsky, & DuPaul, 1992;Eslinger & Biddle, 2000;Rowe, Bullock, Polkey, & Morris, 2001;Williams & Mateer, 1992).…”
Section: Relationship Between Executive Linguistic and Social Functmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In young children with autism, a correlation between impaired performance on an EF task (spatial reversal) and an aspect of social communication (joint attention) has been reported (McEvoy, Rogers, & Pennington, 1993). Abstract language processing and discourse behavior are often disrupted in individuals with injuries to the frontal lobes (e.g., Liles, Coelho, Duffy, & Zalagens, 1989;Pearce, McDonald, & Coltheart, 1998), which are key to intact executive function (e.g., Mishkin, 1964;Iversen & Mishkin, 1970;Fuster, 1980;Diamond & Goldman-Rakic, 1989;Shallice, 1982;Milner, 1963Milner, , 1982. Likewise, there is a considerable relationship between prefrontal brain injury and social dysfunction, including theory of mind and social discourse (Anderson, Damasio, Tranel, & Damasio, 2000;Barkely, Grodzinsky, & DuPaul, 1992;Eslinger & Biddle, 2000;Rowe, Bullock, Polkey, & Morris, 2001;Williams & Mateer, 1992).…”
Section: Relationship Between Executive Linguistic and Social Functmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some studies use story grammar, which examines the organization of story components and the logical relationships between characters and story events, to assess narrative quality (Stein & Glenn, 1979;Thorndyke & Yekovich, 1980). A story grammar quantifies narrative organization into prototypical story structures, such as initiating actions toward character goals, attempts to solve problems, and the consequences of those attempts (Liles, Coelho, Duffy, & Zalagens, 1989;Liles, Duffy, Merritt, & Purcell, 1995). Poorly organized narratives provide clues to cognitive, semantic, and pragmatic impairments, and story grammar provides a reliable tool to evaluate such narratives .…”
Section: Story Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He noted that the normal control subjects produced complete ties 94 percent of the time while the adults with TBI produced complete ties 90 percent of the time. In addition, a study of individuals with TBI by Liles et al included 23 normal control subjects, aged 18 to 22 years, who produced complete cohesive ties at a rate of 98 percent [25]. While significant literature exists regarding the analysis of cohesion in the narrative discourse in adults following TBI [19,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30], fewer studies have been completed that evaluate the effects of stroke on cohesion in narrative discourse [19,22,[31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%