2019
DOI: 10.9734/ajarr/2019/v5i130125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Employees’ Perception of Organizational Injustice on Commitment to Work among Staff of Lagos State Fire Service

Abstract: Human resources managers have attempted, at different points, to figure out ways to prevent the perception of organizational injustice among employees. The perception of injustice has been found to be one of the most influential factors that affect commitment in the workplace. This study examines the effects of employees’ perception of injustice on commitment to work among staff of Lagos State Fire Service. The survey research design was utilized, through the administration of the questionnaire, for the collec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at rules for the conduct of arbitrations (the Arbitration Act 42 of 1965), justice, fairness, and equity are tri-part pillars upon which social exchange theory in dispute resolution mechanism is based (Cortez and Johnston, 2020;Etim and Okudero, 2019). Social exchange theory presents two yardsticks of comparison.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at rules for the conduct of arbitrations (the Arbitration Act 42 of 1965), justice, fairness, and equity are tri-part pillars upon which social exchange theory in dispute resolution mechanism is based (Cortez and Johnston, 2020;Etim and Okudero, 2019). Social exchange theory presents two yardsticks of comparison.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Justice at the workplace is usually related to the outcomes employees receive, procedures adopted to define and allocate these outcomes, and interpersonal interactions with co-workers (Cropanzano & Ambrose, 2015;Folger & Cropanzano, 2001;Folger et al, 2005;McColl-Kennedy & Sparks, 2003;Skarlicki & Folger, 1997). Hence, 'distributive justice' is concerned with outcomes (Etim & Okudero, 2019;Folger & Cropanzano, 2001;McColl-Kennedy & Sparks, 2003), 'procedural justice' is related to the procedures involved in defining those outcomes (Cropanzano & Ambrose, 2015;Etim & Okudero, 2019;Folger & Cropanzano, 2001;Folger & Konovsky, 1989;McColl-Kennedy & Sparks, 2003;McFarlin & Sweeney, 1992) and 'interactional justice' is related to interpersonal interactions (Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, Porter, & Ng, 2001b;Cropanzano, Byrne, Bobocel, & Rupp, 2001;Kerwin, Jordan, & Turner, 2015;Parks, 1996;Reb, Goldman, Kray, & Cropanzano, 2006). Violation of distributive justice leads to anger (Khattak, Khan, Fatima, & Shah, 2019) and resultantly, to an individual's retaliatory behavior (Skarlicki & Folger, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%