Effects of enhanced UV-B on growth and yield of two Syrian crops wheat (Triticum durum var. Horani) and broad beans (Vicia faba) under field conditions

Al‐Oudat, M.; Baydoun, Safaa; Armin, Mohammad Ali

doi:10.1016/s0098-8472(98)00014-8

Cited by 48 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…59 Likewise, in wheat (Triticum durum) and broad beans (Vicia faba) exposed to high levels of UV-B, the plants height, tiller numbers, dry mass and leaf area were positively correlated with UV-B exposure during the vegetative growth stages, meanwhile for wheat, the grain mass and number of spikes increased significantly. 60 The red alga (Gracilaria lemaneiformis) can transfer UV-A energy efficiently, in the same way as that of PAR, to drive photosynthesis.…”

Section: The Effect Of Uv On Plant Growthmentioning

confidence: 99%

Plant Responses to Extended Photosynthetically Active Radiation (EPAR)

Pessarakli¹

2017

APAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current and future life sciences demand more data for experiments, modeling and computing. After introducing Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR), the quality of light was sacrificed for the quantity. PAR has an intrinsic drawback that stems from reporting light sources by a number of the irradiated quanta. In pieces of research on photosynthesis, PAR generally and appropriately is used, whereas PAR has been inappropriately used in pieces of research not dealing with photosynthesis directly as a parameter. Different light sources have diverse spectral photon fluxes (SPF), both in and out of PAR region, which can affect the results of a research quite apart from measured light intensity in PAR. Here, many published papers about light quality effects on plant growth and development are reviewed. In addition, PAR disadvantages and SPF-based extended PAR (EPAR) advantages are discussed to show that a quantitative unit cannot be sufficiently informative where photosynthesis is not the sole parameter. Instead, EPAR is proposed to be considered for research on plants and reporting the results to provide more and detailed information.

show abstract

Section: The Effect Of Uv On Plant Growthmentioning

confidence: 99%

Plant Responses to Extended Photosynthetically Active Radiation (EPAR)

Pessarakli¹

2017

APAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies have reported that ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation can have a wide range of effects on plant growth, ranging from inhibition (Krizek et al, 1997), no effect (Hakala et al, 2002), to promotion (Al-Oudat et al, 1998). The observed UVB effect seems to be species dependent (Kakani et al, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differential responses of two Stellaria longipes ecotypes to ultraviolet-B radiation and drought stress

Sangtarash

Qaderi

Chinnappa

et al. 2009

Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Delayed germination and flowering were found in bean (Saile- Li et al 1998). In contrast, Al-Oudat et al (1998) reported an approximately one week earlier flowering time for wheat and bean. Yao et al (2006b) showed shortened flowering time for tartary buckwheat, resulting in earlier grain ripening.…”

Section: Development and Habitusmentioning

confidence: 81%

Climate Change and Crops

Singh¹

2009

Environmental Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effects of enhanced UV-B on growth and yield of two Syrian crops wheat (Triticum durum var. Horani) and broad beans (Vicia faba) under field conditions

Cited by 48 publications

References 16 publications

Plant Responses to Extended Photosynthetically Active Radiation (EPAR)

Plant Responses to Extended Photosynthetically Active Radiation (EPAR)

Differential responses of two Stellaria longipes ecotypes to ultraviolet-B radiation and drought stress

Climate Change and Crops

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About