2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0025315401004635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of environmental variables on burial depth of two infaunal bivalves inhabiting a tidal flat in southern Chile

Abstract: The annual pattern of burial depth in natural populations of the infaunal bivalves Tagelus dombeii (Tellinacea) and Venus antiqua (Veneracea) is described in relation to annual food availability in both the water column and the sediment and abiotic factors (temperature and salinity) at Coihuín tidal flat, in southern Chile. A field experiment in which burial depth was measured in situ each month (over 14 months), with the aid of a fixed-length nylon thread attached to the shell. For T. dombeii the results show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…IRIBARNE et al (1998) reported that the American oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus Temminck, 1820 was an important source of T. plebeius mortality in Argentinean estuaries. Similar conditions were observed for T. dombeii in the tidal flat of Corhuín, Chile (LARDIES et al 2001). No individuals of M. balthica over five years old were observed in the intertidal areas, reflecting the high mortality of adults predated upon by birds (CARDOSO et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…IRIBARNE et al (1998) reported that the American oystercatcher Haematopus palliatus Temminck, 1820 was an important source of T. plebeius mortality in Argentinean estuaries. Similar conditions were observed for T. dombeii in the tidal flat of Corhuín, Chile (LARDIES et al 2001). No individuals of M. balthica over five years old were observed in the intertidal areas, reflecting the high mortality of adults predated upon by birds (CARDOSO et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Several factors could have contributed to this result. First, large bivalves generally live deeper in the sediment column than smaller conspecific ones, as their proportionally longer siphons allow them to burrow deeper to avoid predation by fishes and shorebirds (Irlandi & Mehlich 1996, de Goeij et al 2001, Lardies et al 2001. Consequently, in this case, the larger bivalves may have been further away from the environmental stressor, namely the terrigenous sediment deposited at the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As time of exposure to air occurs only for a few hours during spring low tides at Coihuin tidal flat, it is expected that the amount of food obtained through this behavior would not be significant when compared to the food acquired under a suspension feeding mode. Furthermore, Lardies et al (2001) described the annual pattern of burial depth in natural populations of the bivalves T. dombeii and Venus antiqua (obligated suspension feeder) in relation to annual food availability in both the water column and sediment, at Coihuín tidal flat. The burial depths dynamics for both species showed a strong correlation with food availability in water column, approximately 60% of the variability in burial depth in both species was explained by concentration of chlorophyll a in the water column (Lardies et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Lardies et al (2001) described the annual pattern of burial depth in natural populations of the bivalves T. dombeii and Venus antiqua (obligated suspension feeder) in relation to annual food availability in both the water column and sediment, at Coihuín tidal flat. The burial depths dynamics for both species showed a strong correlation with food availability in water column, approximately 60% of the variability in burial depth in both species was explained by concentration of chlorophyll a in the water column (Lardies et al 2001). That is, food concentration on the sediment did not affect the burial depth of T. dombeii supporting the pattern obtained in laboratory, indicating that deposit feeding seems to have a minor significance in T. dombeii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%