2006
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[612:eoevoc]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of environmental variations on CO2 Efflux from a Tropical Peatland in eastern Sumatra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A single 24-h CO 2 emission monitoring study by Ali et al (2006) in Jambi also yielded a similar diurnal emission difference of 18 % in selectively logged and drained peatland, and a 13 % difference in an oil palm plot on peat. These three values, with a narrow range of 13 % to 18 % in very different land uses in different parts of Indonesia, are close to the 14.5 % reduction applied in the current study for daytime emission measurements in Acacia plantations.…”
Section: Correcting Co 2 Emissions For Temperature Effectmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A single 24-h CO 2 emission monitoring study by Ali et al (2006) in Jambi also yielded a similar diurnal emission difference of 18 % in selectively logged and drained peatland, and a 13 % difference in an oil palm plot on peat. These three values, with a narrow range of 13 % to 18 % in very different land uses in different parts of Indonesia, are close to the 14.5 % reduction applied in the current study for daytime emission measurements in Acacia plantations.…”
Section: Correcting Co 2 Emissions For Temperature Effectmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Consequently, most published estimates of carbon losses are derived from peat surface CO 2 emission measurements obtained using the closed-chamber method. Even for this method, however, there are fewer than ten peer-reviewed publications presenting CO 2 emissions data under monitored hydrological conditions in SE Asian peatlands (Inubushi et al, 2003;Furukawa et al, 2005;Hadi et al, 2005;Jauhiainen et al, 2005Jauhiainen et al, , 2008Melling et al, 2005;Ali et al, A 4.1-4.7 0.11 ± 0.01 0.29 ± 0.11 B 7.8-9.0 0.12 ± 0.02 2.61 ± 1.37 C, D 4.6-5.1 0.08 ± 0.03 0.15 ± 0.10 E 5.1-5.5 0.07 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.02 F 7.9-9.5 0.06 ± 0.01 0.51 ± 0.24 G, H 5.0-6.2 0.06 ± 0.01 0.19 ± 0.05 * Mean ± SD at 30-50 cm horizon from the peat surface (n = 3 − 9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average groundwater depths in drained areas as presented in Table 1, were estimated from scarce published data (Murayama and Bakar, 1996;Wösten and Ritzema, 2001;Jauhiainen et al, 2004;Hooijer, 2005a, b;Melling et al, 2005;Ali , 2006), and unpublished data collected by the authors in water management projects in Central Kalimantan (Hooijer et al, 2008a), Jambi and Riau (Hooijer et al, 2008b). Water depths in densely drained palm oil and pulp wood plantations on peatland, which are the most abundant plantation types, are best known; common practice is to keep average water tables always below 0.7 m, but they are often as deep as 1.2 m on average (Hooijer et al, 2008b).…”
Section: Groundwater Depths For the Drainage Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Groundwater depth (m) CO2 emission (t h a-1 y-1) Ali et al, 2006Jauhiainen et al, 2004Melling et al, 2005Murayama and Bakar, 1996Wösten and Ritzema, 2001 Fig. 4.…”
Section: History and Future Trends In Peatland Drainagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation