2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of estrous stage and time of day on prepulse inhibition in female rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported sex-differences could be due to changes in reproductive hormones, in particular estrogen (E 2 ) (Swerdlow et al, 1997). However, in accordance with Adams et al (2008), and a previous work from our laboratory (Pereira-Figueiredo et al, 2015), we did not find any correlation between E 2 levels and PPI, which were tested in random phases of the estrous cycle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The reported sex-differences could be due to changes in reproductive hormones, in particular estrogen (E 2 ) (Swerdlow et al, 1997). However, in accordance with Adams et al (2008), and a previous work from our laboratory (Pereira-Figueiredo et al, 2015), we did not find any correlation between E 2 levels and PPI, which were tested in random phases of the estrous cycle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Lehman et al, 1999; Swerdlow et al 2008a). Studies of estrous cycle phase effects on PPI have had inconsistent results (Adams et al, 2008; Bubenikova et al, 2005; Kinkead et al, 2008; Koch, 1998). Here, we report that PRA-induced PPI deficits can be observed in females as well as males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in 1998, Koch found no difference in PPI between male and female rats, but PPI was reduced in female rats during prooestrous, in comparison with oestrous and dioestrous phases of the cycle (Koch, 1998). Other researchers have found opposite results, such as higher PPI in male and female rats in prooestrous, in comparison with female rats in dioestrous (Kinkead et al, 2008) or no differences across the oestrous cycle (Adams et al, 2008). These discrepancies have been attributed to different testing conditions, such as stimulus intensity and testing during the light or dark phase.…”
Section: Bjpmentioning
confidence: 93%