2020
DOI: 10.1177/0022429420977204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Experience on Tempo Preference for Selected Wind Band Masterworks

Abstract: We conducted two studies to complement extant tempo preference work. In Study 1, we explored preferred tempos for excerpts from selected wind band masterworks of band directors and undergraduate instrumental music majors. Participants used a sort-and-rank procedure to indicate tempo preferences of six excerpts. Preferences for four of the pieces were substantially the same: There was no difference between original tempos and the 6% increase in tempo. These results comport with research showing increased prefer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the nine comparisons in our study for the initial tapping task (3 pieces × 3 conditions), tapped tempos for five of them were not significantly different than the tempos participants had heard (from model recordings or from a metronome). Of the remaining four comparisons where significant differences were found, three of them were for decreased-tempo model recordings, where participants' comparatively faster tapping suggests that they felt the recording they heard was indeed too slow, a finding consistent with earlier research (Confredo et al, 2021;Geringer, 2010;Geringer et al, 2016;Yarbrough, 1987). Substantial variability among participants' tapping leads us to speculate whether there are particular characteristics or capacities among listeners that render them more or less amenable to the influence of an externally presented tempo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Among the nine comparisons in our study for the initial tapping task (3 pieces × 3 conditions), tapped tempos for five of them were not significantly different than the tempos participants had heard (from model recordings or from a metronome). Of the remaining four comparisons where significant differences were found, three of them were for decreased-tempo model recordings, where participants' comparatively faster tapping suggests that they felt the recording they heard was indeed too slow, a finding consistent with earlier research (Confredo et al, 2021;Geringer, 2010;Geringer et al, 2016;Yarbrough, 1987). Substantial variability among participants' tapping leads us to speculate whether there are particular characteristics or capacities among listeners that render them more or less amenable to the influence of an externally presented tempo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We opted to use 10% tempo manipulations because they were outside the established JND ranges for tempo (Collyer et al, 1994;Drake & Botte, 1993;Friberg & Sundberg, 1995;Povel, 1981), so we believed that these would be large enough to be noticed but not so large to sound unfitting for the chosen musical excerpts. Additionally, these tempo manipulations were similar in magnitude to other tempo perception studies (Confredo et al, 2021;Geringer & Madsen, 1987;Madsen et al, 1984).…”
Section: Musical Stimulisupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The well-known rock excerpts were preferred at their original recorded tempo, the originally fast samples of other styles (jazz, western, classical, and Brazilian popular) were preferred at slower tempi, and originally slow tempo samples were preferred at faster tempi. In Confredo et al (2021), the relationship with music proficiency was investigated. The music majors preferred the faster tempi, but the band director preferred the original one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%