Effects of expertise on football betting

Abstract

BackgroundFootball (soccer) is one of the most popular sports in the world, including Europe. It is associated with important betting activities. A common belief, widely spread among those who participate in gambling activities, is that knowledge and expertise on football lead to better prediction skills for match outcomes. If unfounded, however, this belief should be considered as a form of “illusion of control.” The aim of this study was to examine whether football experts are better than nonexperts at predicting football match scores.MethodsTwo hundred and fifty-eight persons took part in the study: 21.3% as football experts, 54.3% as laypersons (non-initiated to football), and 24.4% as football amateurs. They predicted the scores of the first 10 matches of the 2008 UEFA European Football Championship. Logistic regressions were carried out to assess the link between the accuracy of the forecasted scores and the expertise of the participants (expert, amateur, layperson), controlling for age and gender.ResultsThe variables assessed did not predict the accuracy of scoring prognosis (R2 ranged from 1% to 6%).ConclusionsExpertise, age, and gender did not appear to have an impact on the accuracy of the football match prognoses. Therefore, the belief that football expertise improves betting skills is no more than a cognitive distortion called the “illusion of control.” Gamblers may benefit from psychological interventions that target the illusion of control related to their believed links between betting skills and football expertise. Public health policies may need to consider the phenomenon in order to prevent problem gambling related to football betting.

Sportwetten: Expertise oder Glück? Ein systematischer Review über Tippstudien

“…Zudem machte sich der Skill-Einfluss in der Gesamtbetrachtung nicht auf finanzieller Ebene bemerkbar. Khazaal et al [21] führte auf der Grundlage von Tipps auf Fußballspiele der Europameisterschaft 2008 logistische Regressionsanalysen durch (kontrolliert für Alter und Geschlecht). Die Befunde zeigten, dass zwischen der Vorhersage des exakten Ergebnisses und der Gruppenzugehörigkeit -unterteilt nach ExpertInnen, Amateuren und Laien -keine statistische Assoziation bestand.…”

A machine learning perspective on responsible gambling

“…Appropriate machine learning model choice depends on the underlying data's statistical properties. Some soccer forecasting models were developed for individual matches, which is typically accounted for by multinomial logistic regression models, given the three main outcomes of a soccer match (e.g., (Khazaal et al, 2012;Koning, 2000;Willoughby, 2002)). But the present model also forecasts bet outcomes, which depend on the specific teams' characteristics, where a conditional logistic regression is more appropriate (Smith, Paton, & Vaughan Williams, 2009).…”

The Impact of Perceived Lottery Knowledge on Problem Lottery Playing: A Moderated Mediation Model

“…At the same time, with more intense emotional experience (Mao & Zhang, 2014), they tends to invest more time and money to buy football lottery (Gordon, Gurrieri, & Chapman, 2015), which is more likely to indulge in the lottery and lead to the problem playing. Khazaal's (2012) research found that football players who have more football skills and knowledge are more likely to have problems in football gambling.…”