2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-2089-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of extended-access self-administration and deprivation on breakpoints maintained by cocaine in rats

Abstract: There is dissociation between changes in rate of cocaine intake (or consumption) and breakpoints maintained on a PR schedule. Extended-access to cocaine produced increases in rate of intake without altering breakpoints. Depending on the experimental question, extended-access conditions may prove useful for studying changes in certain aspects of reinforcement, such as consumption, but not others, such as the strength of a drug as a reinforcer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

13
59
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
13
59
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation is supported by a series of behavioral investigations showing that LgA rats can be considered as genuine drug-addicted individuals compared to ShA rats (Ahmed, 2005). First, LgA rats are more motivated than ShA rats to work to obtain cocaine or heroin, as shown by increased breakpoints in a progressive ratio schedule of drug self-administration (Paterson and Markou, 2003;Ahmed, 2005; but see, Liu et al, 2005). Second, LgA rats have a greater difficulty of abstaining from seeking the drug than ShA rats during extinction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This interpretation is supported by a series of behavioral investigations showing that LgA rats can be considered as genuine drug-addicted individuals compared to ShA rats (Ahmed, 2005). First, LgA rats are more motivated than ShA rats to work to obtain cocaine or heroin, as shown by increased breakpoints in a progressive ratio schedule of drug self-administration (Paterson and Markou, 2003;Ahmed, 2005; but see, Liu et al, 2005). Second, LgA rats have a greater difficulty of abstaining from seeking the drug than ShA rats during extinction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With 1 h of access per session (short access or ShA), drug intake is low and stable over time. In contrast, with 6 or more hours of access per session (long access or LgA), drug intake gradually escalates and becomes excessive compared to control levels (Ahmed and Koob, 1998;Ahmed et al, 2000;Mantsch et al, 2001;Paterson and Markou, 2003;Walker et al, 2003;Roth and Carroll, 2004;Ferrario et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2005). Once established, escalated levels of drug consumption can persist for several weeks, despite reduced drug availability (Ahmed and Koob, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, LgA rats persist more than ShA rats in seeking the drug despite the fact that their behavior is no longer rewarded (Ahmed et al, 2000). Second, LgA rats show an increased motivation to work to obtain the drug compared to ShA rats, as measured under a progressive ratio schedule of drug self-administration (Paterson and Markou, 2003;Lenoir and Ahmed, unpublished results; but see, Liu et al, 2005). Third, when foraging for the drug, LgA rats ignore signals of potential dangers and thus take increased risks to obtain the drug (Vanderschuren and Everitt, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on previous work using continuous access to drug selfadministration (Deneau et al, 1969;Johanson et al, 1976;Bozarth and Wise, 1985;Wolffgramm, 1991), we and others have recently developed and begun to validate an animal model of the transition to compulsive drug use (Ahmed and Koob, 1998;Mantsch et al, 2001;Paterson and Markou, 2003;Roth and Carroll, 2004;Vanderschuren and Everitt, 2004;Liu et al, 2005). Differential access to intravenous i.v.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With 1 h of access per day (short access or ShA), rate of drug intake is low and stable over time. In contrast, with 6 or more hours of access per day (long access or LgA), rate of drug intake gradually escalates above initial levels (Ahmed and Koob, 1998;Ahmed et al, 2000;Mantsch et al, 2001;Paterson and Markou, 2003;Walker et al, 2003;Ferrario et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2005;Perry et al, 2006). The intensity of drug intake escalation is influenced by both the unit dose and the daily duration of drug access (Mantsch et al, 2004;Wee et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%