1977
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.40.9.910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of extensor and flexor group I afferent volleys on the excitability of individual soleus motoneurones in man

Abstract: SUMMARY The contour of the postsynaptic potential (PSP) produced in a neurone by an afferent volley can be derived from the contour of the post-stimulus time histogram (PSTH) of that neurone when it is discharging rhythmically. In the present study the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all forty-four satisfactory recordings there was a significant early increase in the motor unit firing probability, whose actual latency (after correction for the trigger delay) corresponded to that of the H reflex. A similar early homonymous facilitation arising from low threshold afferents and of short latency has already been observed in various muscles (Ashby & LaBelle, 1977;Ashby & Zilm, 1982), including the vastus medialis (Mao, Ashby, Wang & McCrea, 1984), and has been attributed to monosynaptic connexions of muscle spindle I a afferents, although a contribution of oligosynaptic group I excitatory pathways (Jankowska et al 1981) to the early e.p.s.p. appears possible (Mao et al 1984) or even probable (Burke et al 1984).…”
Section: Responses Of Individualmotoneurone8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all forty-four satisfactory recordings there was a significant early increase in the motor unit firing probability, whose actual latency (after correction for the trigger delay) corresponded to that of the H reflex. A similar early homonymous facilitation arising from low threshold afferents and of short latency has already been observed in various muscles (Ashby & LaBelle, 1977;Ashby & Zilm, 1982), including the vastus medialis (Mao, Ashby, Wang & McCrea, 1984), and has been attributed to monosynaptic connexions of muscle spindle I a afferents, although a contribution of oligosynaptic group I excitatory pathways (Jankowska et al 1981) to the early e.p.s.p. appears possible (Mao et al 1984) or even probable (Burke et al 1984).…”
Section: Responses Of Individualmotoneurone8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Knox & Poppele, 1977). Assuming such a relation, others have used the integral of post-stimulus firing probability of human motor units to infer the shape of underlying p.s.p.s in motoneurones (Ashby & Labelle, 1977;Ashby & Zilm, 1978, 1982bHomma & Nakajima, 1979).…”
Section: Synaptic Potentials and Firing Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our 402 SYNAPTIC POTENTIALS AND FIRING PROBABILITY observations also lend empirical support to the use ofthe integral of the post-stimulus firing probability of human motor units to estimate the initial time course of the underlying aggregate e.p.s.p.s. In active soleus motor units of human subjects, Ashby & Labelle (1977) documented post-stimulus effects produced by group I volleys in extensor muscle nerves; the duration of the primary correlogram peak (3-6 msec) was taken as a measure of the rise time of the underlying e.p.s.p. Their correlogram peaks were wider than ours, probably due to larger afferent volleys and to greater temporal dispersion of conduction in afferent and efferent pathways.…”
Section: -Correlogram Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of a particular input can be determined by constructing a histogram of the time of occurrence of motoneurone spikes following repeated presentation of a suitable stimulus. This procedure extracts from the naturally occurring spike train only those changes in firing which are time-locked to the stimulus (Moore, Segundo, Perkel & Levitan, 1970;Kranz & Corti, 1973;Kranz, Adorjani & Baumgartner, 1973;Stephens, Usherwood & Garnett, 1976;Knox, Kubota & Poppele, 1977;Ashby & Labelle, 1977). The effect of a given input is revealed in terms of the specific contribution it has made to the total firing pattern of the cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%