2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of extraction methods and particle size distribution on the structural, physicochemical, and functional properties of dietary fiber from deoiled cumin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
215
3
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
31
215
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the surface morphologies of BSEDF showed a characteristic honeycomb structure with a greater number of holes and cracks which was significantly different to those of BSCDF. This difference corresponds to the residues of some proteins around DFs bundles which were not completely removed after chemical treatment (Ma and Mu, 2016). Larger the pores observed in the cell wall of BSEDF, bonds between the fibrils become more loosened which may contribute for easy diffusion of various components (glucose and other sugars) while BSCDF and BSP may delay the diffusion on the basis of microstructure.…”
Section: Semmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the surface morphologies of BSEDF showed a characteristic honeycomb structure with a greater number of holes and cracks which was significantly different to those of BSCDF. This difference corresponds to the residues of some proteins around DFs bundles which were not completely removed after chemical treatment (Ma and Mu, 2016). Larger the pores observed in the cell wall of BSEDF, bonds between the fibrils become more loosened which may contribute for easy diffusion of various components (glucose and other sugars) while BSCDF and BSP may delay the diffusion on the basis of microstructure.…”
Section: Semmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure of DFs samples and BSP were examined as described by Ma et al (2016) using SEM (JSM-6490LV, Japan) at 15.kV. Representative micrographs were taken for each sample at 200, 500 and 1000×magnifications.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopy (Sem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations