2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2008.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hamernik et al (1980) found that a damaged cochlea and vibrated membranous labyrinth were the main causes for vibration-induced cochlear function changes after low-frequency vibration [9]. Consistent with the results of this study, several factors were found to be associated with the enhanced DPOAE response amplitudes such as hypoxia [23], low frequency electromagnetic fields [24,25], and induced labyrinthitis [26,27], and some ototoxic drugs [26]. By contrast, some other studies reported that the DPOAE response amplitudes were significantly depressed following a number of factors including the administration of ototoxic drugs [28,29], acoustic trauma or noise overexposure [29,30], Meniere’s disease [31], sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss [32], acoustic neuroma [33], presbycusis [34], and hereditary hearing disorders [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Hamernik et al (1980) found that a damaged cochlea and vibrated membranous labyrinth were the main causes for vibration-induced cochlear function changes after low-frequency vibration [9]. Consistent with the results of this study, several factors were found to be associated with the enhanced DPOAE response amplitudes such as hypoxia [23], low frequency electromagnetic fields [24,25], and induced labyrinthitis [26,27], and some ototoxic drugs [26]. By contrast, some other studies reported that the DPOAE response amplitudes were significantly depressed following a number of factors including the administration of ototoxic drugs [28,29], acoustic trauma or noise overexposure [29,30], Meniere’s disease [31], sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss [32], acoustic neuroma [33], presbycusis [34], and hereditary hearing disorders [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although some studies show that they do not cause any difference in hearing, some other studies show that they have negative effects. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study [179] concluded that higher ELF-EMF exposure at 50 Hz, 10.182 kV/m coupled to 4.45 pT MF may give rise to adverse auditory effects especially to the organ of Corti and outer hair cells as a result of decreased distortion product auto acoustic emission amplitudes in higher frequency region localized in basal turn of cochlea in rabbits which have also resemblance with human's frequency spectra. As regards RFR-EMF, MP use has been associated with tinnitus and acoustic neuroma [38,41].…”
Section: Auditory and Ocular Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ear is the first biological structure to be hit by EMFs from MP. In addition, relatively greater vulnerability of cochlear outer hair cells to injuries from a diversity of exogenous and endogenous agents makes the system a victim of radiation emissions [179,180]. These days, about 50% of world's population possesses a MP [30] and even greater than that are experiencing EMF emissions through "passive mobile phoning" [181].…”
Section: Auditory and Ocular Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation