2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of feeding frequency on feed leaching loss and grow-out patterns of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei fed under a diurnal feeding regime in pond enclosures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In many shrimp farms, feed is offered two or three times a day, without considering the food-related physiological characteristics of the animals (Pontes et al 2008). The use of optimal feed management practices is an important step in reducing economic and environmental pressures on commercial shrimp farms (Carvalho and Nunes 2006). Aguzzi et al (2004) state that the feeding profile of a species may be the result of complex interactions between their behavioral rhythm and environmental modulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many shrimp farms, feed is offered two or three times a day, without considering the food-related physiological characteristics of the animals (Pontes et al 2008). The use of optimal feed management practices is an important step in reducing economic and environmental pressures on commercial shrimp farms (Carvalho and Nunes 2006). Aguzzi et al (2004) state that the feeding profile of a species may be the result of complex interactions between their behavioral rhythm and environmental modulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High hydrostability does not necessarily indicate high performance. On the contrary, it may indicate greater hardness and difficulty to digest , Cerecer-Cota et al 2005, and leaching of crude protein and lipid in the feed exhibited a reduced trend with length of time immersed in water (Carvalho & Nunes 2006). In our study, Diet E1 had the highest hydrostability and the lowest digestibility of lipids and carbohydrates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, there was no interaction between feed level and feeding intervals (Table 2). Moreover, results found in the literature show the benefits of increasing the feeding frequency as uniform lots, better nutrients absorption, and lower leaching losses, therefore better performance (Wang et al, 1998;Zarate and Lovell, 1999;Carvalho and Nunes, 2006). When fish were fed 3% of live weight, feeding management promoted good results (Table 1), considering an average temperature of 25°C, with a feed conversion of 1.70 and 424g weight gain in 120 days of cultivation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%