2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
220
2
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 667 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
25
220
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors stated that the lower C sequestration potential of MW biochar could be compensated by its higher potential for production of renewable energy, for requiring less heat input. Sun et al (2014) compared hydrochars to dry-pyrolysis biochars derived from the same feedstock, and found hydrochars more acidic and lower in C contents.…”
Section: A) Hydrothermal Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors stated that the lower C sequestration potential of MW biochar could be compensated by its higher potential for production of renewable energy, for requiring less heat input. Sun et al (2014) compared hydrochars to dry-pyrolysis biochars derived from the same feedstock, and found hydrochars more acidic and lower in C contents.…”
Section: A) Hydrothermal Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…crop and forest residues, animal manure, sewage sludge, energy crops) are the most important factors in determining the possibilities of using biochars (Sun et al, 2014). Due to their diversified properties, biochars have become widely used not only in environmental protection (improvement of the quality of soil, climate change mitigation, waste management, remediation of contaminated soil, animal feed), but also in many industries (energy production, an ingredient of cosmetics, and a component of building materials and clothing) (Lehmann and Joseph, 2015;Sun et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of other materials, the weight loss due to pyrolysis was much larger, but did not exceed 60 %. Hossain et al [25] and Sun et al [26] demonstrated in their studies that, next to qualitative or quantitative composition, a decisive factor in the weight loss of materials subjected to pyrolysis is temperature of the process. Regardless of the type of pyrolysed material, less residue is observed at higher temperatures as a result of increased losses of oxidisable substances, including inorganic compounds [4,8].…”
Section: Weight Loss Of Organic Materials After Thermal Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the many advantages of biochar in reducing the bioavailability, toxicity and mobility of many organic contaminants [26,42], there are also hazards associated with the production process itself and the subsequent use of the material. The most common risk encountered when using biochar is the possibility of introducing substantial amounts of PAHs into the soil.…”
Section: Elemental Composition Of Biocharsmentioning
confidence: 99%