2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of female directors on gender diversity at lower organization levels and CSR performance: Evidence in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for ROA, it is found that board gender diversity weakens relationship of social dimension with ROAt+1, shown from lower adjusted R-square in moderated condition . This finding is not consistent with result presented by Nguyen & Thai (2022) that proved that board gender diversity positively associated with better CSR performance, in which we expect better financial performance as well. However, this finding is consistent with research by Yarram & Adapa (2022), in which stated that there is negative association between gender diversity and corporate risk-taking activities.…”
Section: Hypothesis Testingcontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…As for ROA, it is found that board gender diversity weakens relationship of social dimension with ROAt+1, shown from lower adjusted R-square in moderated condition . This finding is not consistent with result presented by Nguyen & Thai (2022) that proved that board gender diversity positively associated with better CSR performance, in which we expect better financial performance as well. However, this finding is consistent with research by Yarram & Adapa (2022), in which stated that there is negative association between gender diversity and corporate risk-taking activities.…”
Section: Hypothesis Testingcontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…From the perspective of upper‐echelons theory, females might have distinctive characteristics compared to men that allow them to improve the effectiveness of CSR and sustainability‐related initiatives (Orazalin, 2020). For example, their more communal characteristics (Njiwa et al, 2023), engagement with diverse range of functions (Yarram & Adapa, 2021), leadership styles (Galbreath, 2016; Pucheta‐Martínez & Gallego‐Álvarez, 2019), and moral reasoning (Nguyen & Thai, 2022) make them more likely to influence firms to increase their CSR investment and lead them to influence their prosocial actions. Empirically, Bear et al (2010) are among the few researchers who have worked on the hypothetical relationship between board gender diversity‐CSR‐firm reputation.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%