1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1986.tb03859.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Fenfluramine on Eight Outpatients With the Syndrome of Autism

Abstract: SUMMARY Fenfluramine was administered to eight autistic outpatients in a double‐blind study to determine its effects on symptomatic behavior, developmental scores, blood serotonin levels and platelet counts. Two children benefited substantially according to academic and cognitive tests, parental and teacher reports and the principal investigator's clinical impressions. They also manifested behavioral and mood swings. The remaining six children showed varying degrees of response; one was withdrawn during the st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32, 51 However, other reports have shown that fenfluramine actually lowers blood 5HT and does not increase plasma 5HT in humans. 86, 123 5HT effects are mediated extracellularly through 5HT1B and 5HT2B receptors and intracellularly via cellular capture of 5HT through the 5HT uptake transporter (5HTT). 66 A reduction in 5HT uptake has been shown to produce increased concentrations of 5HT in the pulmonary vasculature, which might contribute to the pathogenesis of lung injury.…”
Section: Safety Concerns Of Antiobesity Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32, 51 However, other reports have shown that fenfluramine actually lowers blood 5HT and does not increase plasma 5HT in humans. 86, 123 5HT effects are mediated extracellularly through 5HT1B and 5HT2B receptors and intracellularly via cellular capture of 5HT through the 5HT uptake transporter (5HTT). 66 A reduction in 5HT uptake has been shown to produce increased concentrations of 5HT in the pulmonary vasculature, which might contribute to the pathogenesis of lung injury.…”
Section: Safety Concerns Of Antiobesity Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous study reported global improvement in the behaviour of children sensitive to this treatment, with particular improvement in responsiveness to other people, communication, bizarre responses to the environment, and selfgenerated behaviour . In a subsequent study of 14 autistic children, significant improvements in sensory and motor behaviour were noted (Ritvo et al 1983), although other studies showed that fenfluramine does not ameliorate the symptoms of all patients (August et al 1984(August et al , 1985Klykylo et al 1985;Ho et al 1986;Stubbs et al 1986). In a subsequent study of 14 autistic children, significant improvements in sensory and motor behaviour were noted (Ritvo et al 1983), although other studies showed that fenfluramine does not ameliorate the symptoms of all patients (August et al 1984(August et al , 1985Klykylo et al 1985;Ho et al 1986;Stubbs et al 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Geller et al (1982) reported that fenfluramine improved the IQ scores and some clinical signs of three autistic patients. In a subsequent study of 14 autistic children, significant improvements in sensory and motor behaviour were noted (Ritvo et al 1983), although other studies showed that fenfluramine does not ameliorate the symptoms of all patients (August et al 1984(August et al , 1985Klykylo et al 1985;Ho et al 1986;Stubbs et al 1986). A more recent study showed that some children also had improvement in behavioural signs such as motor activity, anxiety, mood difficulties and attention disturbances (Barthelemy et al 1988a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, over the past 15 years a number of theoretical papers have emerged that have a common theme: The impact of the environment on development will depend on the nature of the organism on whom the environment impinges (e.g., Horowitz, 1987, Plomin et al, 1977Rutter, 1983;Thomas & Chess, 1976;Wachs, 1986). Within the biomedical literature, individual differences in reactivity to specific drugs are commonplace (Neims, 1986;Rapport, Stoner, DePaul, Birmingham, & Tucker, 1985;Stubbs, Budden, Jackson, Terdal, & Ritvo, 1986), as are individual differences in physiological reactivity to stress (Falkner & Rogonessi, 1986;Kasl & Cobb, 1970;Magnusson, 1988;Mason, 1968aMason, , 1968b and diet (Kawasaki, Delea, Barter, & Smith, 1978). At a behavioral level, for infrahuman populations, differential reactivity to objectively similar environments is seen as a function of species differences (Henderson, 1980;Hinde & Stevenson-Hinde, 1973), strain differences within species (Freedman, 1974;Fuller, 1967;Sackett, Rupenthal, Fahrenburch, Holm, & Greenough, 1981), or differences in nutritional history of the organism (Findley, Ng, Reid, & Armstrong, 1981;Weinberg, Dallman, & Levine, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%