2021
DOI: 10.1080/01448765.2021.1891458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of fish-derived protein hydrolysate, animal-based organic fertilisers and irrigation method on the growth and quality of grape tomatoes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al (2021) stated that the rice and fish yield increased in integrated system compared to monoculture. Similar results were obtained by García-Santiago et al (2021). They stated that leaf dry weight, total plant biomass dry weight, fruit number and total yield were higher in the organic fertilization treatment (including fish-derived protein hydrolysate as an N-source), surpassing the conventional treatment by 35%, 9%, 21%, and 4% for these parameters, respectively, though the difference was only significant for leaf dry weight in grape tomatoes.…”
Section: Biomass Production and Partitioningsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Li et al (2021) stated that the rice and fish yield increased in integrated system compared to monoculture. Similar results were obtained by García-Santiago et al (2021). They stated that leaf dry weight, total plant biomass dry weight, fruit number and total yield were higher in the organic fertilization treatment (including fish-derived protein hydrolysate as an N-source), surpassing the conventional treatment by 35%, 9%, 21%, and 4% for these parameters, respectively, though the difference was only significant for leaf dry weight in grape tomatoes.…”
Section: Biomass Production and Partitioningsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Many studies (e.g., [ 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 ]) have reported beneficial effects of the application of protein hydrolysate biostimulants on crop growth, yield and product quality (e.g., in tomato, spinach, lettuce, celery, melon, chickpea, maize or beans). For example, Testani et al [ 79 ] in Capsicum annuum and Choi et al [ 80 ] in Solanum lycopersicum and Lactuca sativa observed that protein hydrolysates increased nutrient uptake, especially nitrogen, by acting directly on enzymes of nitrogen and carbon metabolism, such as glutamine synthetase, glutamate synthase, nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, malate and isocitrate dehydrogenases and citrate synthase; these results are in agreement with those obtained in Zea mays plants [ 81 ].…”
Section: Protein Hydrolysatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the consensus on rising crop productivity without the intensive use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides that negatively impact the environment, various plant biostimulants (PBs) of microbial and non-microbial origins have been used (Rouphael and Colla 2020;Colla et al 2020;García-Santiago et al 2021;Gupta et al 2022). Recently, the European Union (EU) reached a consensual definition for PBs (EU Regulation 2019/1009), as follows: 'A plant biostimulant shall be an EU fertilizing product the function of which is to stimulate plant nutrition processes independently of the product's nutrient content with the sole aim of improving one or more of the following characteristics of the plant or the plant rhizosphere: nutrient use efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stress, quality traits, or availability of confined nutrients in the soil or rhizosphere' (EU 2019).…”
Section: Experiments Site and Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%