1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004420050084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of floral herbivory, limited pollination, and intrinsic plant characteristics on phenotypic gender in Sanicula arctopoides

Abstract: Sexual expression in hermaphroditic plants is often a function of environmental factors affecting individuals before or during flowering. I tested for the effects of floral herbivory and lack of pollination in early umbels on the relative proportions of hermaphroditic and staminate (male) flowers produced on later umbels by Sanicula arctopoides, a monocarpic, andromonoecious perennial. Neither floral herbivory or lack of early pollination had a significant effect on the ratio of the two floral morphs, but the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to herbivory on sources, damage to sinks (buds, flowers, and fruit) in hermaphrodite plants routinely induces a plastic shift in sex allocation toward femaleness. Destruction of flowers resulted in an increase in the proportion of hermaphrodite flowers (i.e., those with female function) in three of four andromonoecious species studied, Heracleum lanatum [Hendrix 1984], Pastinaca sativa [Hendrix and Trapp 1981], and Isomeris arborea [Krupnick and Weis 1998] but not Sanicula arctopoides [Lowenberg 1997]. Additionally, anther smut disease eliminates male function, but only slightly reduces female function of hermaphrodites in gynomonoecious Dianthus silvester (Shykoff et al 1997).…”
Section: Key Parameters Impacted By Herbivorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to herbivory on sources, damage to sinks (buds, flowers, and fruit) in hermaphrodite plants routinely induces a plastic shift in sex allocation toward femaleness. Destruction of flowers resulted in an increase in the proportion of hermaphrodite flowers (i.e., those with female function) in three of four andromonoecious species studied, Heracleum lanatum [Hendrix 1984], Pastinaca sativa [Hendrix and Trapp 1981], and Isomeris arborea [Krupnick and Weis 1998] but not Sanicula arctopoides [Lowenberg 1997]. Additionally, anther smut disease eliminates male function, but only slightly reduces female function of hermaphrodites in gynomonoecious Dianthus silvester (Shykoff et al 1997).…”
Section: Key Parameters Impacted By Herbivorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although little is known about the sex allocation mechanisms of monoecious species (Dellaporta & Calderon‐Urrea, 1993), it is well known that plants with this reproductive system are capable of facultative adjustments in response to a variety of physical and biological stimuli (Freeman et al. , 1980; Charnov, 1982; Cid‐Benevento, 1987; Lowenberg, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of facultative adjustments also exists in species in which sex is chromosomally determined although the mechanisms remain controversial. Plant literature has plenty of examples showing that in many species sex allocation responds to environmental or intrinsic conditions varying as a function of age, size, herbivore damage, disease, weather, nutritional condition and light (Freeman et al, 1980(Freeman et al, , 1981Charnov, 1982;Cid-Benevento, 1987;Delph & Lloyd, 1991;Sakai & Weller, 1991;Wells & Lloyd, 1991;Klinkhamer et al, 1997;Lowenberg, 1997;McKone et al, 1998;de Jong et al, 1999). Most of the studies have concentrated on sex-allocation shifts in response to environmentally induced variation in spatial or parental resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Male function is often negatively affected by leaf damage through reducing flower traits such as flowers size (Frazee and Marquis 1994, pollen number , Lowenberg 1997, and pollen size (Delph et al 1997, Lehtilae and.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%