2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of forced-choice runway variations on rats’ T-maze serial pattern learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rats have a tendency to alternate their choices in the T-maze [32] , which facilitates learning of the shift-win rule. In contrast, because of this predisposition and, further, because of reinforcement of the alternating behavior, the following rule change requiring the adoption of a stay-win strategy should be challenging, which is exactly what the present experiment revealed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats have a tendency to alternate their choices in the T-maze [32] , which facilitates learning of the shift-win rule. In contrast, because of this predisposition and, further, because of reinforcement of the alternating behavior, the following rule change requiring the adoption of a stay-win strategy should be challenging, which is exactly what the present experiment revealed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T-maze tasks have been used extensively to investigate various aspects of brain function, including spatial working memory (Zimmerberg, Sukel & Stekler, 1991; Wan, Pang & Olton, 1994; Nagahara & Handa, 1997), long-term reference memory (Olton & Papas, 1979), perseveration (Riley, Lochry, Shapiro & Baldwin, 1979), and foraging strategy such as the use of “win-shift” versus “win-stay” strategies in response to different reinforcement contingencies (Szelest & Cohen, 2006). Much of this work has been done in rodents, but when scaled appropriately, the T-maze can also be suitable for non-rodent species as well, including the ferret (Park & Baum, 1999), cat (Burgess, Villablanca, Levine, 1986), squirrel monkey (Peretti & Baird, 1976), horse (Heird, Lennon & Bell, 1981), goat and sheep (Hosoi, Swift, Rittenhouse & Richards, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%