1999
DOI: 10.4141/s98-081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of forest soil compaction and organic matter removal on leaf litter decomposition in central British Columbia

Abstract: Kranabetter, J. M. and Chapman, B. K. 1999. Effects of forest soil compaction and organic matter removal on leaf litter decomposition in central British Columbia. Can. J. Soil Sci. 79: 543-550. As part of the long-term soil productivity study in central British Columbia, we examined the effect of soil compaction and organic matter removal on trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) litter decomposition. We compared three levels of organic matter removal (stem-only, whole-tree harvest, and scalped mineral s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these effects were often variable among sites and soil horizons, precluding identification of general treatment effects. Relatively few microbial parameters, such as biomass, enzyme activity, nitrogen mineralization potential and litter decomposition rates, were measured (Kranabetter and Chapman, 1999;Li et al, 2003;Busse et al, 2006;Mariani et al, 2006;Tan et al, 2008) and, like other soil properties, they did not reveal consistent treatment effects. The few studies that examined microbial community composition were limited in scope and did not take advantage of the full-factorial experimental design and replicated experimental sites, or were limited in coverage and resolution of the microbial communities by the available methods (Axelrood et al, 2002a, b;Chow et al, 2002;Busse et al, 2006;Hartmann et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, these effects were often variable among sites and soil horizons, precluding identification of general treatment effects. Relatively few microbial parameters, such as biomass, enzyme activity, nitrogen mineralization potential and litter decomposition rates, were measured (Kranabetter and Chapman, 1999;Li et al, 2003;Busse et al, 2006;Mariani et al, 2006;Tan et al, 2008) and, like other soil properties, they did not reveal consistent treatment effects. The few studies that examined microbial community composition were limited in scope and did not take advantage of the full-factorial experimental design and replicated experimental sites, or were limited in coverage and resolution of the microbial communities by the available methods (Axelrood et al, 2002a, b;Chow et al, 2002;Busse et al, 2006;Hartmann et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Following harvest and treatments, plots were planted with lodgepole pine and hybrid spruce seedlings. A more complete description of the experimental design, pre-and post- harvest vegetation and soil characteristics, and ecology of the field sites are to be found in Holcomb (1996) and Kranabetter and Chapman (1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil degradation was found to reduce leaf decomposition and nutrient release in tropical forests (Tian 1998), and some effects of organic matter removal on decomposition rates were found in our initial experiment, immediately after treatment installation (Kranabetter and Chapman 1999). The results from this second study, which began 5-6 yr posttreatment, suggest soil disturbance had no longer-term effects on litter decomposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In an earlier LTSP study from central British Columbia, we commented that nutrient release from decaying litter appeared to be greater on mineral soils than forest floors when compared against remaining leaf mass (Kranabetter and Chapman 1999). The change in N content of decaying litter was compared more carefully in this second field study using artificial materials to isolate litter bags from contact with forest floors or mineral soil.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%