2018
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of frequency, intensity, duration and volume of walking interventions on CVD risk factors: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials among inactive healthy adults

Abstract: CRD42016039409.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
108
2
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
108
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For BMI and waist size, reductions were greater in the high one-minute, 30-min and 60-min cadence quartiles than the moderate quartile. Analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data has been less conclusive on this point, with systematic reviews of walking interventions reporting a lack of evidence demonstrating a dose-response effect [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For BMI and waist size, reductions were greater in the high one-minute, 30-min and 60-min cadence quartiles than the moderate quartile. Analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data has been less conclusive on this point, with systematic reviews of walking interventions reporting a lack of evidence demonstrating a dose-response effect [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Special Issue includes three extended editorials,3–5 three systematic reviews6–8 (including one meta-analysis6), one narrative review, one scoping review9 and one individual participant pooled analysis 10. World Health Organization Program Leader Fiona Bull and the co-author of the 1997 review Adrianne Hardman3 provide the historical context.…”
Section: Comprehensive Update On Walking and Health In This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The huge popularity of fitness trackers13 has been mostly founded on people’s desire to monitor the number of steps in daily life, but the pace of those steps is often ignored. Oja and colleagues6 meta-analysed 37 randomised controlled trials that examined the effect of walking characteristics (amount, frequency and intensity) on an array of cardiovascular risk markers to determine whether there is a dose–response effect. In other words, is ‘more or faster (walking) the better’ for cardiovascular health?…”
Section: Ok But How Much and How Fast?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, walking is safe and easy to integrate in everyday life (8). Secondly, walking has bene cial effects on several CVD risk factors (9,10), and reduces the risk of all-cause and CVD-speci c mortality (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walking may hence be one of the most evident physical activity types to promote on a population level to prevent CVD. However, because the age-related decline in maximal aerobic capacity (VO 2 max) (13,14) leads to a higher relative intensity during walking among elderly, the preventive potential of walking may be highest among older individuals (9). Younger individuals may therefore need to engage in high-intensity physical activity (HIPA) types such as cycling and running to achieve a similar relative intensity and accompanying health bene ts (11,(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%