1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00056-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on otolithic and semicircular canal eye movements and perceived vertical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
85
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only right anodal GVS inXuenced the perception of the vertical signiWcantly, evidenced by a clockwise deviation of the subjective visual vertical. Given that the amplitude of the visual vertical deviation depends on current intensity (Mars et al 2005), and that we used small current amplitudes compared to previous studies, our values appear to be consistent with that of previous Wndings (Zink et al 1998;Mars et al 2005). A signiWcantly stronger inXuence of right GVS on the subjective visual vertical has also been reported in patients with right parietal damage (Saj et al 2006).…”
Section: Diverences Between Right and Left Galvanic Vestibular Stimulsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only right anodal GVS inXuenced the perception of the vertical signiWcantly, evidenced by a clockwise deviation of the subjective visual vertical. Given that the amplitude of the visual vertical deviation depends on current intensity (Mars et al 2005), and that we used small current amplitudes compared to previous studies, our values appear to be consistent with that of previous Wndings (Zink et al 1998;Mars et al 2005). A signiWcantly stronger inXuence of right GVS on the subjective visual vertical has also been reported in patients with right parietal damage (Saj et al 2006).…”
Section: Diverences Between Right and Left Galvanic Vestibular Stimulsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Using such a binaural bipolar conWguration, GVS is known to increase the Wring rate in vestibular aVerents on the cathodal side and to decrease the Wring rate on the anodal side (Goldberg et al 1984). This change in the Wring rate has been associated with illusory movements of both own body (Mars et al 2005;Fitzpatrick et al 2002) and visual Weld (Zink et al 1998).…”
Section: Galvanic Vestibular Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using such a binaural bipolar configuration, GVS is known to increase the firing rate in vestibular afferents on the cathodal side and to decrease the firing rate on the anodal side (Goldberg, Smith, & Fernandez, 1984). This change in the firing rate has been associated with illusory movements of both own body and visual field (Fitzpatrick & Day, 2004;Fitzpatrick et al, 2002;Lenggenhager et al, 2008;Mars et al, 2005;Zink, Bucher, Weiss, Brandt, & Dieterich, 1998).…”
Section: Galvanic Vestibular Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…87,88 This technique is being investigated as a method for distinguishing the vestibulocochlear nerve from labyrinthine lesions and as a possible test of otolith function, which may be preferentially affected by low-current intensities. 89,90 Averaged surface EMG responses from the sternocleidomastoid muscles in response to repetitive auditory clicks has been proposed as a method of measuring vestibular (saccule) afferents that are eventually transmitted to anterior neck muscles. [91][92][93] Vestibular testing in children.…”
Section: Emerging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%