2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2005.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of gamma irradiation on the shoot length of Cicer seeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation could be correlated with the results obtained by Khalil et al (1986), who attributed a decreased in shoot and root lengths at higher doses of gamma rays resulted from reduction mitotic activity in meristematic tissues and reduced moisture contents in seeds. The decrease in morphological characteristics of various crops has already reported by (Thimmaiah et al, 1998;Khan and Qureshi, 2001;Al-Salhi et al, 2004 andToker et al, 2005), which supports the present investigation.…”
Section: Morphological Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This observation could be correlated with the results obtained by Khalil et al (1986), who attributed a decreased in shoot and root lengths at higher doses of gamma rays resulted from reduction mitotic activity in meristematic tissues and reduced moisture contents in seeds. The decrease in morphological characteristics of various crops has already reported by (Thimmaiah et al, 1998;Khan and Qureshi, 2001;Al-Salhi et al, 2004 andToker et al, 2005), which supports the present investigation.…”
Section: Morphological Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Kumar and Mishra (2004) noted that in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), germination percentage generally decreased with the increasing doses of gamma rays. Reduction in germination percentage with increasing dose of gamma radiation has also been reported in Pinus (Thapa, 2004), Rye (Akgun and Tosum, 2004), Chickpea (Khan et al, 2005), Cicer (Toker et al, 2005) and Citrus jambhiri Lush. (Sharma et al, 2013;Saini and Gill, 2009;Kaur and Rattanpal, 2010).…”
Section: Results and Disscusionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Several workers (Akgun and Tosum, 2004;Alcantara et al, 1996;Karthika and Lakshmi, 2006;Khan et al, 2005;Kumar and Mishra, 2004;Thapa, 2004;Toker et al, 2005) reported such behavior of physical and chemical mutagens in different crop plants. Taking into the account of the findings documented by various workers (Chaghtai and Prasad, 1979;Gichner and Veleminsky, 1974;Jain and Agarwal, 1987;Mensah et al, 2007;Nazir et al, 2005;Santos, 1961;Sareen and Koul, 1999) and it is inferred that presoaking renders the seed vulnerable to the effect of physical and chemical mutagens and the germination is inhibited due to biochemical interference of physical and chemical mutagens The reduction in plant survival percentage following with physical and chemical mutagens has been reported by many workers, and results of present investigation regarding survival are in agreement with earlier findings in different plants (Bari, 1971;Cheema and Atta, 2003;Davies et al, 1975;Hussein and Disouki 1975;Kar et al, 1995;Siddiq and Swaminathan, 1968;Singh et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%