Effects of Gender and Collaborative Learning Approach on Students’ Conceptual understanding of Electromagnetic Induction

Adolphus, Telima; Omeodu, Doris

doi:10.5430/jct.v5n1p78

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the students' different skills are dominated by their adaptability to the technology applied. In collaboration, gender differences are frequently employed to determine a group's task divisions, especially group works that require physical skills (Adolphus & Omeodu, 2016). Students tend to be spectators and data writers (like a secretary) when this method is implemented during the experimental activities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple Skill Laboratory Activities: How to Improve Students’ Scientific Communication and Collaboration Skills

Malik¹,

Ubaidillah²

2021

JPII

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to analyze the effects of experiment models and gender on scientific communication and collaboration skills. This study employed a quasi-experimental design consisting of five groups as control classes and five groups as experimental classes. The subject of this study was 327 students (168 students used HOT Lab and 159 used Multiple Skill; 69 Male and 258 Female from 18 to 22 years old) with heterogeneous skills and learning habits from five different universities representing four regions: Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan, and Sulawesi. The control class conducted activities based on the Higher-order Thinking Laboratory model, while the experimental class conducted activities based on the Multiple Skill Laboratory Activity Model. The data were collected by employing a validated instrument and were analyzed by employing a Multivariate test. This study shows that the experimental model has more significant influences on improving students' skills than gender. Specifically, the Multiple Skill Laboratory Activity Model (MSLAM) improves students’ collaboration skills better than communication skills. MSLAM explores more activities to practice collaboration skills, e.g., brainstorming, exploration, and measurement, while the activities for practicing communication skills is depended on analysis and presentation only. This study also reveals that the experiment model and gender are not suitable for concurrent analysis. This study is expected to provide methods for further researchers to optimize students’ scientific communication and collaboration skills. Furthermore, this study provides an overview for teachers to practice several thinking skills at one time.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple Skill Laboratory Activities: How to Improve Students’ Scientific Communication and Collaboration Skills

Malik¹,

Ubaidillah²

2021

JPII

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, in the data processing, analysing and reporting stages, the reverse was the case. This finding is also reinforced by the results of previous studies which show that generallly there is no difference in ability between male and female students, but only in a few conditions (Adolphus and Omeodu, 2016;Aeschlimann et al, 2016;Bećirović, 2017;Brodahl et al, 2011;Crymble, 2016;Master et al, 2017;Putri et al, 2018;Sayed and Mohamed, 2013). This result is different from previous research in that male students tend to have better analytical thinking skills than female students.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 57%

Students Critical-Creative Thinking Skill: A Multivariate Analysis of Experiments and Gender

Malik

Ubaidillah

2020

IJCRSEE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Students’ ability to practice several thinking skills is one of the problems common in today’s learning. Therefore, this research aims to describe the improvement of students’ critical-creative thinking skills through a multivariate analysis of the experiment model and gender. The experiment models used in this research are the Multiple Skill Laboratory Activity Model (MSLAM) and Higher Order Thinking Laboratory (HOT Lab), with gender, considered as a factor influencing a successful learning process. Research method was a quasi-experiment with data obtained from 328 respondents from five different universities in Indonesia and analyzed using the multivariate tests. The results showed that the experiment model affected the learning outcomes more than genders. Furthermore, the Multiple Skill Laboratory Activity Module proved to improve students’ critical and creative thinking skills better than the Higher Order Thinking Laboratory. This study expected to provide a comparison in determining the types of suitable experiments for learning at colleges and schools.

show abstract

“…Research findings show that learning that involves collaboration and interaction of constructivist learning environments and integrative pedagogy has a positive impact on critical thinking skills, creative thinking, problem-solving, decision-making skills, student communication skills (Virtanen & Tynjälä, 2019) and concept understanding (Adolphus & Omeodu, 2016). Students actively construct knowledge through observation and experience (Sawitre & Pipitgool et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Improve Critical Thinking in Physics Learning? A Systematic Literature Review

Ubaidillah,

Hartono,

Marwoto

et al. 2023

Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

COME MIGLIORARE IL PENSIERO CRITICO NELL’APPRENDIMENTO DELLA FISICA? UNA REVISIONE SISTEMATICA DELLA LETTERATURA Abstract Critical thinking skills are essential skills needed in the 21st century. Critical thinking skills can be trained in students through student-centered learning. Through a literature review, this research aims to determine learning models that can improve critical thinking skills in physics. Data collection was based on Scopus and Google Scholar database sources. This type of document comes from journal articles with the keywords «critical thinking», «learning models», and «physics learning» from the years (2011-2021). The literature review used procedures adapted from PRISMA. Documents published are based on predetermined content analysis criteria, including year of publication, author, article source, learning model, physics material topic, research subject, education level, and assessment. Inquiry learning and the higher-order thinking laboratory (HOT Lab) dominate the learning models used to improve critical thinking skills. The critical skills indicators used vary. Indicators of critical thinking skills. Self-regulated learning is rarely used in research instruments compared to other indicators of critical thinking skills. The instruments used are multiple-choice, essays, worksheets, and observation sheets. Research respondents at the university level are often used in studies of critical thinking skills. Fluid mechanics is a topic that is often used in research. This research contributes to improving students’ critical thinking skills through various recommended learning models. Research findings show that student-centered learning models can improve critical thinking skills.

show abstract

Effects of Gender and Collaborative Learning Approach on Students’ Conceptual understanding of Electromagnetic Induction

Cited by 7 publications

References 24 publications

Multiple Skill Laboratory Activities: How to Improve Students’ Scientific Communication and Collaboration Skills

Multiple Skill Laboratory Activities: How to Improve Students’ Scientific Communication and Collaboration Skills

Students Critical-Creative Thinking Skill: A Multivariate Analysis of Experiments and Gender

How to Improve Critical Thinking in Physics Learning? A Systematic Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About