Effects of Gender and Education on the Moral Reasoning of Kuwait University Students

Abstract

The moral reasoning of 189 undergraduate students from the College of Education, Kuwait University was studied, using the Defining Issues Test (DIT) by Rest (1990). The subjects ranged in age from 18 to 26 years (mean age =20.83). The results revealed that the sample reasoned predominantly at stage 4. Principled Morality Percentage Score (P%-score) was found to be below the norms reported in the literature for this group. There were no gender differences in moral reasoning. However, formal education did have a significant effect on moral judgment scores. In the light of this cross-cultural study as well as of other similar studies, a series of questions related to the understanding of moral development has been raised for further examination.

Islamic Personal Religion and Moral Reasoning in Social Justice and Equality: The Evidence From Indonesian College Students

“…For replicability, former Muslim studies of Kohlbergian moral reasoning provide rather clear evidence of cross-study consistency and test-retest reliability (Al-Ansari, 2002;Bouhmama, 1988). These studies showed that Muslims tend to reason predominantly at the conventional stages of moral development and to range in their P score standard deviation from 10 to 20 points, a range similar to the ones documented from various Western samples.…”

Instilling Values Character Education Through Playing Role Model in Learning History

“…This interactive learning describes the context of a historical phenomenon that never existed. Through interactive analytic methods descriptive, with a variation of a case study, learning "role playing" information very effectively in the effort to inculcate the values of character education in the nation's history in school subjects [44], [45].…”

Moral Reasoning and Moral Orientation of U.S. and Turkish University Students

“…Baek has concluded that Kohlberg's framework alone is insufficient to explain Korean children's moral reasoning. In another study, Al-Ansari (2002) reported that Kuwaiti university students reason predominantly at the conventional level. Al-Ansari suggested that "adherents to the Muslim religion rely more on divine law for moral decision-making than on justice as measured within the Kohlbergian framework" (p. 79).…”

“…Since cross-cultural differences in moral orientation is still a controversial issue for some researchers (e.g., Al-Ansari, 2002;Baek, 2002), further research is needed to examine whether people in individualistic societies are oriented toward universal moral principles, including justice and rights, to a larger extent than people in collectivistic societies.…”