2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-014-1580-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of global orbital cutoff value and numerical basis set size on accuracies of theoretical atomization energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of DN basis set, the global orbital cutoff (defined by the presence of a heavy Ln atom) is 4.3 Å; for DND, it increases to 5.0 Å; and for DNP, to 5.8 Å. The global orbital cutoff is applied to the generation of the numerical basis sets to limit the range of the numerical integrations and reduce the computational cost: this is a reasonable simplification, since the charge density decreases quickly as the distance from an atomic nucleus increases [54][55][56]. All the calculations were spin-polarized.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of DN basis set, the global orbital cutoff (defined by the presence of a heavy Ln atom) is 4.3 Å; for DND, it increases to 5.0 Å; and for DNP, to 5.8 Å. The global orbital cutoff is applied to the generation of the numerical basis sets to limit the range of the numerical integrations and reduce the computational cost: this is a reasonable simplification, since the charge density decreases quickly as the distance from an atomic nucleus increases [54][55][56]. All the calculations were spin-polarized.…”
Section: Computational Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exchange−correlation of the electron within the density functional theory (DFT) framework was considered by the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) in the form of the Perdew−Burke−Ernzerhof (PBE) functional 40 with double numerical plus d-functions (DNP) basis set. 41 The geometrical structures and adsorption energy of one Kr or Xe atom adsorbed on the cluster of top six MOFs were optimized and calculated with the abovementioned level. The empirical dispersion correction of DFT-D2 proposed by Grimme was chosen to describe the weak van der Waals interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural optimization of related reactants, products, and intermediates, as well as transition state search, was performed by the DFT method implemented in the Dmol3 module of Materials Studio software, in which the revised Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation (RPBE-GGA) functional was employed . The effective core potentials (ECPs) proposed by Bergner were used to describe the inner electrons, while the polarizable DND basis set was employed in all of these calculations. The transition states were found using the LST/QST method, and the transition state structures were verified by frequency analysis.…”
Section: Model and Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%