“…The most common use of the CAM in nanomaterials studies is in the observation and quantification of the effect on angiogenesis (Table ). The CAM, with regard to assessing the angiogenic or antiangiogenic properties of nanomaterials, has been applied to Au NPs, − peptide-conjugated Au NPs, − therapeutic conjugated Au NPs, Cu NPs, , TiO 2 NPs, ZnO NPs, − selenium NPs loaded in chitosan/collagen scaffolds, polycaprolactone scaffolds loaded with Y 2 O 3 NPs, therapeutic loaded mesoporous silica NPs (MSNPs), MSNPs in a collagen scaffold, magnetic metal-Fe 2 O 4 NPs, carbon Qdots, diamond NPs, , graphite NPs, ,, multiwall carbon nanotubes, , graphene nanosheets, fullerenes, , liposomes, , chronic myeloid leukemia cell exosomes, inulin/vitamin E micelles, PLGA NPs, ,, PLA NPs, polysaccharide NPs, , chitosan NPs, , dendrimers, − therapeutic nanoemulsions, − and vincristine-loaded hydroxyapatite NPs . Angiogenic studies in the CAM are done for two major reasons, the first being screening of an unexpected or unwanted effect and the second being the active use of the CAM to study therapeutic NPs with planned angiogenic effects.…”