2020
DOI: 10.14235/bas.galenos.2020.3668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Gold Nanoparticles on Angiogenesis in A Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common use of the CAM in nanomaterials studies is in the observation and quantification of the effect on angiogenesis (Table ). The CAM, with regard to assessing the angiogenic or antiangiogenic properties of nanomaterials, has been applied to Au NPs, peptide-conjugated Au NPs, therapeutic conjugated Au NPs, Cu NPs, , TiO 2 NPs, ZnO NPs, selenium NPs loaded in chitosan/collagen scaffolds, polycaprolactone scaffolds loaded with Y 2 O 3 NPs, therapeutic loaded mesoporous silica NPs (MSNPs), MSNPs in a collagen scaffold, magnetic metal-Fe 2 O 4 NPs, carbon Qdots, diamond NPs, , graphite NPs, ,, multiwall carbon nanotubes, , graphene nanosheets, fullerenes, , liposomes, , chronic myeloid leukemia cell exosomes, inulin/vitamin E micelles, PLGA NPs, ,, PLA NPs, polysaccharide NPs, , chitosan NPs, , dendrimers, therapeutic nanoemulsions, and vincristine-loaded hydroxyapatite NPs . Angiogenic studies in the CAM are done for two major reasons, the first being screening of an unexpected or unwanted effect and the second being the active use of the CAM to study therapeutic NPs with planned angiogenic effects.…”
Section: The Chick Embryo and Cam For Assessing Therapeutic Efficacy ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common use of the CAM in nanomaterials studies is in the observation and quantification of the effect on angiogenesis (Table ). The CAM, with regard to assessing the angiogenic or antiangiogenic properties of nanomaterials, has been applied to Au NPs, peptide-conjugated Au NPs, therapeutic conjugated Au NPs, Cu NPs, , TiO 2 NPs, ZnO NPs, selenium NPs loaded in chitosan/collagen scaffolds, polycaprolactone scaffolds loaded with Y 2 O 3 NPs, therapeutic loaded mesoporous silica NPs (MSNPs), MSNPs in a collagen scaffold, magnetic metal-Fe 2 O 4 NPs, carbon Qdots, diamond NPs, , graphite NPs, ,, multiwall carbon nanotubes, , graphene nanosheets, fullerenes, , liposomes, , chronic myeloid leukemia cell exosomes, inulin/vitamin E micelles, PLGA NPs, ,, PLA NPs, polysaccharide NPs, , chitosan NPs, , dendrimers, therapeutic nanoemulsions, and vincristine-loaded hydroxyapatite NPs . Angiogenic studies in the CAM are done for two major reasons, the first being screening of an unexpected or unwanted effect and the second being the active use of the CAM to study therapeutic NPs with planned angiogenic effects.…”
Section: The Chick Embryo and Cam For Assessing Therapeutic Efficacy ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 41 ] Nanomedicine is one of the effective methods to solve these problems. In recent decades, several nanoparticles were reported to emerge as angiogenesis‐promoting agents including reduced graphene oxide, [ 42 ] europium hydroxide nanoparticles, [ 43 ] gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), [ 44 ] etc. Similar to conventional angiogenic agents, these nanomaterials have also been found to promote angiogenesis by modulating the level of ROS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%