2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2004.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of grazing intensity on small mammal population ecology in wet meadows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
51
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
51
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in line with other studies that suggest cattle grazing does not have an impact on the sex ratio of populations (Peles and Barrett 1996;Schmidt et al 2005). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are in line with other studies that suggest cattle grazing does not have an impact on the sex ratio of populations (Peles and Barrett 1996;Schmidt et al 2005). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, these models point to heterogeneity between sites as a major explanatory factor for survival rates. Because of these differences, the results of the survival analysis regarding the potential impact of cattle grazing still remain unclear, a conclusion commonly reached by other studies (Keesing 1998;Schmidt et al 2005). These inconsistencies in the results of survival analyses across studies could be explained by the flexibility of deer mice in terms of niche choice (Bowers and Smith 1979;Geier and Best 1980;Galindo and Krebs 1985): deer mice are opportunistic feeders (Bunker 2001;Desrosiers et al 2002) and can adapt well to open habitats (Pearson et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It is especially noticeable in lowland areas. Studies on small mammals population structure show unequivocally that the effect is negative (Schmidt et al, 2005;Torre et al, 2007). Nevertheless, grazed areas are important as feeding grounds for birds (Wheeler, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…trampling, causing a reduction of suitable soil for burrow systems, has also been identified as a grazing-induced factor affecting small mammal communities (torre et al 2007). Negative consequences of herbivore grazing on small mammals have been investigated and reported in several ecosystems (Eccard et al 2000;Chapman & Ribic 2002;Beever & Brussard 2004;Schmidt et al 2005;torre et al 2007;Wheeler 2008;Muñoz et al 2009). The assessment of the consequences of livestock grazing on small mammal communities is fundamental because small mammals are key species in grazed ecosystems: they have top-down effects on plants (Manson et al 2001;Bagchi et al 2006;Roth et al 2009;Scheper & Smit 2011) and invertebrate populations (Churchfield et al 1991;Elkinton et al 2004), and they are an important prey source for birds and other mammals (Hanski et al 2001;taylor 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large herbivores may affect plant diversity in these habitats (Olff & Ritchie 1998) and their grazing may reduce the overall degree of vegetation height and cover (Schmidt et al 2005;Bakker et al 2009). Changes in vegetation structure produced by large herbivore grazing may also be a consequence of the modifications it induces on physical and mechanical soil properties (e.g., compaction induced by trampling) and their interactions, with a variety of effects depending on the grazing intensity (Schmidt et al 2005;Zhao et al 2007;Zhou et al 2010;Gan et al 2012). Changes in the chemical properties of soil and, especially, potential N fertilization as a consequence of grazing may also have potential affects on plant species composition and growth (Binkley et al 2003;Wesche et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%