1960
DOI: 10.1037/h0038574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of group experience on individual problem solving.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility that individual resources for performing a task effectively improve as a function of social interaction between group members during collective task performance has been described in the literature as 'group-to-individual transfer' (G-I transfer, e.g. Hudgins, 1960;Laughlin & Sweeney, 1977). G-I transfer has been predominantly investigated in educational and developmental psychology (for reviews see, for example, Azmitia, 1996;Dillenbourg, Baker, Blaye, & O'Malley, 1996;Slavin, 1992).…”
Section: Group-to-individual Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that individual resources for performing a task effectively improve as a function of social interaction between group members during collective task performance has been described in the literature as 'group-to-individual transfer' (G-I transfer, e.g. Hudgins, 1960;Laughlin & Sweeney, 1977). G-I transfer has been predominantly investigated in educational and developmental psychology (for reviews see, for example, Azmitia, 1996;Dillenbourg, Baker, Blaye, & O'Malley, 1996;Slavin, 1992).…”
Section: Group-to-individual Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a well-known fact that groups perform better in problem-solving and idea generation than individuals in terms of time taken, the number of problems solved, and the number of solutions generated [19]. Past research confirms that groups with better collaboration perform better in problem solving and creativity [20,21].…”
Section: B Multiplayer Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Amaria et al., 1964; Slavin & Tanner, 1979; Johnson, Skon & Johnson, 1980) but there is also evidence which has failed to show any individual cognitive gain (e.g. Hudgins, 1960; Peterson & Janicki, 1979; Webb & Kenderski, 1984) even with very similar tasks (e.g. Ringel & Springer, 1980;Glachan & Light, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%